首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

青海省典型土遗址病害及动力测试分析
引用本文:王常亚,石玉成,刘琨,,李桐林,缐正英.青海省典型土遗址病害及动力测试分析[J].世界地震工程,2021,0(2):232-240.
作者姓名:王常亚  石玉成  刘琨    李桐林  缐正英
作者单位:1. 中国地震局兰州地震研究所, 甘肃 兰州 730000;2. 中国地震局黄土地震工程重点实验室, 甘肃 兰州 730000
摘    要:通过调查青海省四处典型土遗址发现表面剥蚀、冲沟、裂缝、坍塌、人为破坏等病害普遍存在,门源古城和湟中县部分长城因缺乏保护,人为破坏情况严重,土遗址保存状况恶劣;大通县长城和湟中县加牙烽燧在开展保护工程后,土遗址整体保存状况良好。大通县长城2处墙体的现场脉动观测结果显示:(1)2处墙体的速度峰值随高度增加有明显放大现象,一号墙体由底部到顶部速度峰值放大1.7倍,二号墙体放大2.9倍,放大效应让2处墙体在地震时更不稳定;(2)两处墙体的测试频率在3.04 Hz至5.71 Hz之间,通过计算获得一、二号墙体差值百分比分别为30.5%和11.1%,表明二号墙体与场地相互作用明显,处于高风险影响,当遭遇地震的卓越频率与之相近时会发生明显的共振现象。因此应对观测处墙体进行加固,以减小与场地的相互作用,提高墙体的抗震稳定性。

关 键 词:青海省土遗址  病害特征  脉动观测  放大效应  相互作用

Disease characteristics and the analysis of microseism observation of typical earthen ruins in Qinghai
WANG Changya,SHI Yucheng,LIU Kun,' target="_blank" rel="external">,LI Tonglin,XIAN Zhengying.Disease characteristics and the analysis of microseism observation of typical earthen ruins in Qinghai[J].World Information On Earthquake Engineering,2021,0(2):232-240.
Authors:WANG Changya  SHI Yucheng  LIU Kun  " target="_blank">' target="_blank" rel="external">  LI Tonglin  XIAN Zhengying
Institution:1. Lanzhou Institute of Seismology,CEA, Lanzhou 730000, China;2. Key Laboratory of Loess Earthquake Engineering, Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, CEA, Lanzhou 730000, China
Abstract:Through investigation of four typical earthen ruins in Qinghai Province, it was found that surface erosion, gullies, cracks, collapses, man-made damage and other diseases were widespread. Among them, the ancient city of Menyuan and a part of the Great Wall in Huangzhong were poorly preserved due to lack of protection, and their stability was seriously threatened by human activities. The Great Wall of Datong County and the Jiaya Beacon Tower in Huangzhong County had many small-scale diseases, but after the protection project had been carried out, the overall preservation of the earthen ruins were in good condition.Field pulsation observation results of two walls at the Great Wall in Datong County showed that:①The peak velocity of the two walls was obviously enlarged with the increase in height, the peak velocity from the bottom to the top of the wall 1 was magnified 1.7 times, and the wall 2 was magnified 2.9 times, the amplification effect would make the wall more unstable in the earthquake.②The test frequency frequency of the two walls was between 3.04Hz and 5.71Hz; the test period of the two walls was similar to the site predominant period, and the percentage difference was 30.5% for wall 1 and 11.1% for wall 2, which indicated that the two walls were at high risk of impact and would resonate significantly in the earthquake.
Keywords:the earthen ruins  disease characteristics  microseism observation  percentage difference
点击此处可从《世界地震工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《世界地震工程》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号