Estimation of return periods for extreme sea levels: a simplified empirical correction of the joint probabilities method with examples from the French Atlantic coast and three ports in the southwest of the UK |
| |
| Authors: | Paolo Antonio Pirazzoli Alberto Tomasin |
| |
| Institution: | (1) Laboratoire de Géographie Physique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 1 Place Aristide Briand, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France;(2) Università di Venezia, Dorsoduro 3861, 30123 Venice, Italy;(3) CNR-ISMAR, S. Polo 1364, 30125 Venice, Italy |
| |
| Abstract: | The joint probability method (JPM) to estimate the probability of extreme sea levels (Pugh and Vassie, Extreme sea-levels from tide and surge probability. Proc. 16th Coastal Engineering Conference, 1978, Hamburg, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp 911–930, 1979) has been applied to the hourly records of 13 tide-gauge stations of the tidally dominated Atlantic coast of France (including
Brest, since 1860) and to three stations in the southwest of the UK (including Newlyn, since 1916). The cumulative total length
of the available records (more than 426 years) is variable from 1 to 130 years when individual stations are considered. It
appears that heights estimated with the JPM are almost systematically greater than the extreme heights recorded. Statistical
analysis shows that this could be due: (1) to surge–tide interaction (that may tend to damp surge values that occur at the
time of the highest tide levels), and (2) to the fact that major surges often occur in seasonal periods that may not correspond
to those of extreme astronomical tides. We have determined at each station empirical ad hoc correction coefficients that take
into account the above two factors separately, or together, and estimated return periods for extreme water levels also at
stations where only short records are available. For seven long records, for which estimations with other computing methods
(e.g. generalized extreme value GEV] distribution and Gumbel) can be attempted, average estimations of extreme values appear
slightly overestimated in relation to the actual maximum records by the uncorrected JPM (+16.7 ± 7.2 cm), and by the Gumbel
method alone (+10.3 ± 6.3 cm), but appear closer to the reality with the GEV distribution (−2.0 ± 5.3 cm) and with the best-fitting
correction to the JPM (+2.9 ± 4.4 cm). Because the GEV analysis can hardly be extended to short records, it is proposed to
apply at each station, especially for short records, the JPM and the site-dependent ad hoc technique of correction that is
able to give the closest estimation to the maximum height actually recorded. Extreme levels with estimated return times of
10, 50 and 100 years, respectively, are finally proposed at all stations. Because astronomical tide and surges have been computed
(or corrected) in relation to the yearly mean sea level, possible changes in the relative sea level of the past, or foreseeable
in the future, can be considered separately and easily added to (or deduced from) the extremes obtained. Changes in climate,
on the other hand, may modify surge and tide distribution and hence return times of extreme sea levels, and should be considered
separately.
Parts of this paper have been presented orally at the session “Geophysical extremes: scaling aspects and modern statistical
approaches” of the EGU General Assembly, Vienna, 2–6 April 2006. |
| |
| Keywords: | Tide gauge Sea level Extreme values Return period Atlantic coast France UK |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
