Uranium transport through fractured silicic tuff and relative retention in areas with distinct fracture characteristics |
| |
| Authors: | English C Pearcy James D Prikryl Bret W Leslie |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Institute of Volcanology and Seismology FEB RAS, Piip-9, Petropavlovsk Kamchatsky 683006, Russia;2. EPAM, Zastavskaya 22-2, Mega Park, Saint Petersburg 196084, Russia;1. Department of Electrical, Computer and IT Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran\n;2. Department of Computer Engineering, Academic Center of Education, Kermanshah, Iran;3. Information Technology Department, Cyber-Space Research Institute, Tehran, Iran;4. Computer Engineering and Information Technology Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran\n |
| |
| Abstract: | The Nopal I uranium (U) deposit, in the Pefia Blanca District, Chihuahua, Mexico, has been identified as analogous in some regards to the candidate U.S. high-level waste (HLW) repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Uranium transport at the Nopal I deposit has been studied to investigate mechanisms by which HLW components could be transported through silicic tuff over long time periods. This investigation focused on approximately 1400 m2 of essentially continuous bedrock outcrop spanning the Nopal I deposit and surrounding host tuff. Data collected document: (i) the distributions of U within and around the Nopal I deposit, (ii) the distribution and characteristics of the fracture network within and surrounding the deposit, and (iii) the transport of U away from the deposit mainly along fracture paths. Uranium-series isotopic measurements indicate mobilization of U along the margin of the deposit within the last 1 Ma and significant U transport at about 54 Ka. Transport of U away from the Nopal I deposit along a few relatively continuous mesofractures achieved maximum distances at least 20 times greater than transport through the general fracture network composed of thousands of less continuous microfractures within and surrounding the deposit. Uranium transport away from the deposit appears to be largely independent of variations in the general fracture network pattern. Transport of U away from individual micro- and meso-fractures into homogeneous, unfractured tuff matrix appears limited to distances less than 1 mm. At the Nopal I deposit, matrix diffusion does not appear to have been an important factor for retardation of U. This analysis suggests a ranking for U retention: (i) microfracture network retention mesofracture retention, and (ii) individual microfracture retention matrix retention. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
