| 艺术参与下的乡村空间重构 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄诗雨,李险峰.艺术参与下的乡村空间重构[J].地理研究,2020,39(3):709-720. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄诗雨 李险峰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国农业大学园艺学院,北京100093 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 21世纪以来,艺术参与乡村实践逐渐形成一股风潮,一定程度上影响着乡村发展转型与重构。本文基于乡村三重空间模型,结合以行动实践捕捉权力形式的框架,通过综合比较艺术参与乡村的不同实践模式,分析艺术参与下的乡村空间重构表现,并进一步探讨其影响机制,以期为艺术助推乡村振兴提供审慎参考。首先,乡村空间重构表现如下：乡村地区的突变往往作为显著特征,包含物质空间的结构性改变;乡村表征由话语权力主体进行再定义,以艺术方、当地政府和社会资本为主导力量;乡村生活则因此充满混杂与不确定性,与村民的日常生活、传统观念产生碰撞;此外,其每一部分都与其他部分相互作用。再者,乡村空间重构受到内源性因素和外源性因素的共同影响,二者持续相互作用,在一定时间的积累后,促进民众参与和集体认同,从而推动乡村在新阶段的转型与发展。
|
| 关 键 词： | 艺术 艺术参与 乡村 乡村空间 重构 |
| 收稿时间： | 2019-02-18 |
| 修稿时间： | 2019-05-31 |
Reconstruction of rural space with art participation |
| |
| HUANG Shiyu,LI Xianfeng.Reconstruction of rural space with art participation[J].Geographical Research,2020,39(3):709-720. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Shiyu LI Xianfeng |
| |
| Institution: | College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100093, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Since the beginning of the 21st century, the exploratory action of art participation in rural practice has gradually emerged, which has affected the development, transformation and reconstruction of the countryside to a certain extent. This research is based on Halfacree's three-fold model of rural space, combined with Frisvoll's action-taking framework to capture power form. By comprehensively comparing the different practice modes of art participation in the rural areas, this article analyzes the performance and impact mechanism of rural space reconstruction with the participation of art, in order to provide some prudent references for art to promote rural revitalization. Firstly, the article analyzes the performance of the rural space's performance with art participation: dramatic changes in rural areas are significant features, including structural changes in physical space, such as the increase in landmarks, reconstruction of buildings, and changes in rural landscapes. The rural representation is redefined by the main body of discourse power, with artistic groups, local governments and social capital as the leading force, which promotes the continuous exchange and flow of production factors such as population, capital, and resources between urban and rural areas. Then these changes brought about a mix of rural life, which was in sharp contrast with the villagers' daily life and traditional concepts, and caused collisions and exchanges. Each part of three-fold model of rural space is interconnected and interacts with other parts. The article also discusses the influence mechanism of rural space’s reconstruction with art participation. The process of rural space’s reconstruction is affected by both endogenous and exogenous factors. Endogenous factors refer to the basic conditions of the village, including the village's natural geographic background, historical and cultural resources, and socioeconomic foundation. Exogenous factors include the leading force represented by art groups, government and capital, and the auxiliary force represented by academic institutions and public welfare organizations. With the elapse of time, they can promote public participation and collective identity, and help develop multi-level and diverse social participation as the endogenous driving force for rural development, thereby promoting rural transformation and development in the new stage. |
| |
| Keywords: | art art participation countryside rural space reconstruction |
|
| 点击此处可从《地理研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《地理研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
