首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Legitimacy of Different Knowledge Types in Natural Resource Governance and Their Functions in Inter-Institutional Gaps
Authors:H M Tuihedur Rahman  June Y T Po  Arlette S Saint Ville  Nicolas D Brunet  Stephen M Clare  Samantha Darling
Institution:1. Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada;2. School for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada;3. hm.rahman@mail.mcgill.ca tuihedur.rahman@dal.caORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7308-3447;5. School of Environmental Design and Rural Development, The University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
Abstract:Abstract

This study expands the Inter-Institutional Gaps (IIGs) framework to conceptualize the legitimacy associated with different types of ecological knowledge (e.g., scientific, traditional and local) used in natural resource governance. We draw on primary qualitative data, and document analysis to examine a case of inland fisheries management in the north-eastern floodplain of Bangladesh. We posit that the pragmatic, moral, cognitive, and regulative legitimacy for different types of ecological knowledge are repeatedly reevaluated by rule-makers and resource users in the process of rule-devising. Results show that inter-institutional gaps may be perpetuated when formal rules do not sufficiently consider traditional and local ecological knowledge. While it is widely proposed that systematically incorporating different knowledge types can better address local-national policy problems, this study underscores that the source of legitimacies for different knowledge types often differs across formal and informal institutional actors. Recognizing the differences is critical to fishers’ resource management.
Keywords:Bridging agents  constitutional  non-constitutional  resource science  rules  traditional ecological knowledge
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号