Refining P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for marine particulate samples: Storage conditions and extraction recovery |
| |
| Authors: | Barbara J Cade-Menun Claudia R Benitez-Nelson Perry Pellechia Adina Paytan |
| |
| Institution: | aDepartment of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Building 320, Room 118, Stanford, CA 94305-2115, United States;bDepartment of Geological Sciences and Marine Science Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, United States;cDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, United States |
| |
| Abstract: | Solution 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has recently been used to characterize phosphorus species within marine particles. However, the effects of sample collection, storage and preparation have not been thoroughly examined. In this study, samples of settling particulates collected from a 1200-m sediment trap located in Monterey Bay, California, were subjected to various storage options (i.e., no storage, refrigeration, freezing, and oven-drying and grinding) prior to extraction for solution 31P-NMR spectroscopy. Freezing, refrigerating and drying samples for periods of up to 6 months prior to extraction with 0.25 M NaOH + 0.05 M Na2EDTA increased the concentration of extracted P by an average of 16% relative to samples extracted without storage. Pre-extraction storage also introduced some minor changes in P speciation, by increasing the percentage of orthophosphate by up to 15% and decreasing the percentage of pyrophosphate by up to 5%, relative to the abundances of these P species in samples extracted without storage. Drying caused the biggest changes in speciation, specifically decreasing more extensively the relative percentage of pyrophosphate compared to other treatments. Nevertheless, observed changes in speciation due to sample storage within a specific sample were small relative to differences observed among samples collected sequentially in the same area, or reported differences among samples collected at different locations. Samples were also analyzed by solid-state 31P-NMR spectroscopy before and after extraction, to examine extraction-related changes in P speciation. Comparison of solution with solid-state 31P NMR indicates that extraction with NaOH–EDTA removes the majority of organic esters, but only a variable portion of phosphonates (39–67%). In addition, there was preferential extraction of Ca-associated phosphate over Mg-, Fe- and Al-associated phosphate. Solution 31P NMR enables much higher resolution of P species within samples, particularly when it is important to speciate orthophosphate monoesters and diesters, or if polyphosphates are present. However, combining solid-state 31P NMR with solution 31P NMR spectroscopy for marine particles should be conducted when examining inorganic P speciation and the abundance of phosphonates. |
| |
| Keywords: | P speciation NaOH– EDTA Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
