Comparing the performance of a 2‐D finite element and a 2‐D finite volume model of floodplain inundation using airborne SAR imagery |
| |
| Authors: | M S Horritt G Di Baldassarre P D Bates A Brath |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Halcrow Group Ltd, Burderop Park, Swindon, Wilts SN4 0QD, UK.;2. Idraulica ‐ DISTART, University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy;3. School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK |
| |
| Abstract: | The performances of a finite volume model (SFV) and finite element model (TELEMAC‐2D) in reproducing inundation on a 16 km reach of the river Severn, United Kingdom, are compared. Predicted inundation extents are compared with 4 airborne synthetic aperture radar images of a major flood event in November 2000, and these are used to calibrate 2 values of Manning's n for the channel and floodplain. The four images are shown to have different capacities to constrain roughness parameters, with the image acquired at low flow rate doing better in determining these parameters than the image acquired at approximately peak flow. This is assigned to the valley filling nature of the flood and the associated insensitivity of flood extent to changes in water level. The level of skill demonstrated by the models, when compared with inundation derived using a horizontal water free surface, also increases as flow rate drops. The two models show markedly different behaviours to the calibration process, with TELEMAC showing less sensitivity and lower optimum values for Manning's n than SFV. When the models are used in predictive mode, calibrated against one image and predicting another, SFV performs better than TELEMAC. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
| Keywords: | inundation modelling finite element finite volume remote sensing |
|
|
