Changes in stream flow regime in headwater catchments of the Yellow River basin since the 1950s |
| |
| Authors: | Hongxing Zheng Lu Zhang Changming Liu Quanxi Shao Yoshihiro Fukushima |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China;2. CSIRO Land and Water, Christian Laboratory, GPO Box 1666, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;3. College of Resources and Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, People's Republic of China;4. CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences, Private Bag No. 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia;5. Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, 457‐7 Motoyama, Kamigamo, Kita‐ku, Kyoto, 603‐8047, Japan |
| |
| Abstract: | The headwater catchments of the Yellow River basin generate over 35% of the basin's total stream flow and play a vital role in meeting downstream water resources requirements. In recent years the Yellow River has experienced significant changes in its hydrological regime, including an increased number of zero‐flow days. These changes have serious implications for water security and basin management. We investigated changes in stream flow regime of four headwater catchments since the 1950s. The rank‐based non‐parametric Mann–Kendall test was used to detect trends in annual stream flow. The results showed no significant trend for the period 1956 to 2000. However, change‐point analysis showed that a significant change in annual stream flow occurred around 1990, and hence the stream‐flow data can be divided into two periods: 1956–1990 and 1991–2000. There was a considerable difference in average annual stream flow between the two periods, with a maximum reduction of 51%. Wet‐season rainfall appears to be the main factor responsible for the decreasing trend in annual stream flow. Reductions in annual stream flow were associated with decreased interannual variability in stream flow. Seasonal stream flow distribution changed from bimodal to unimodal between the two periods, with winter stream flow showing a greater reduction than other seasons. Daily stream flow regime represented by flow duration curves showed that all percentile flows were decreased in the second period. The high flow index (Q5/Q50) reduced by up to 28%, whereas the reduction in the low flow index (Q95/Q50) is more dramatic, with up to 100% reduction. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
| Keywords: | stream flow regime trend in annual stream flow flow duration curve |
|
|
