Sea surface temperature variability in the shelf‐slope region of the Northwest Atlantic |
| |
| Authors: | KR Thompson RH Loucks RW Trites |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Oceanography , Dalhousie University , Halifax, N.S., B3H 4J1;2. R.H. Loucks Oceanology Limited , 24 Clayton Park Drive, Halifax, N.S., B3M 1L3;3. Department of Fisheries and Oceans , Bedford Institute of Oceanography , P.O. Box 1006, Dartmouth, N.S., B2Y4A2 |
| |
| Abstract: | Abstract Sea surface temperature (SST) variability in the shelf‐slope region of the northwest Atlantic is described and then explained in terms of latent and sensible heat exchange with the atmosphere. The basic data are primarily engine‐intake temperature measurements made by merchant ships over the period 1946–80. The data have been grouped by month and area and an empirical orthogonal function analysis has been performed to determine the dominant modes of variation. The first two modes account for 44% of the total variance. The first mode corresponds to in‐phase changes of SST from the Grand Banks to Mid‐Atlantic Bight; the second mode corresponds to opposite changes of SST on the Grand Banks and Mid‐Atlantic Bight. The time‐dependent amplitudes of these large‐scale modes have pronounced low‐frequency components; the associated changes in SST are typically 3°C. It is also shown that winter anomalies last longer than summer anomalies; their typical decay scales are 6 and 3 months, respectively. The onshore component of geostrophic wind is significantly correlated with the amplitude of the first mode in winter. We note the strong land‐sea contrast of temperature and humidity in this region during winter and explain the wind‐SST correlation in terms of latent and sensible heat exchanges. The second mode (i.e. the difference in SST between the Grand Banks and Mid‐Atlantic Bight) also appears to be related to changes in atmospheric circulation during the winter. A stochastic model for mixed layer temperature is finally used to model the SST autocorrelation functions. Following Ruiz de Elvira and Lemke (1982), it includes a seasonally‐varying feedback coefficient. The model successfully reproduces the extended persistence of winter anomalies with physically realistic parameter values but it cannot account for the summer reinforcement of winter anomalies on the Scotian Shelf. We speculate that this is due to the occasional entrainment of water, cooled the previous winter, into the shallow summer mixed layer. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
