首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


An iron isotope signature related to electron transfer between aqueous ferrous iron and goethite
Authors:Je-Hun Jang  Ryan Mathur  Laura J Liermann  Shane Ruebush  Susan L Brantley
Institution:

aGeosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA

bGeology, Juniata College, Huntingdon, PA 16652, USA

cBiochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA

Abstract:We measured the Fe isotope fractionation during the reactions of Fe(II) with goethite in the presence and absence of a strong Fe(III) chelator (desferrioxamine mesylate, DFAM). All experiments were completed in an O2-free glove box. The concentrations of aqueous Fe(II) (Fe(II)aq]) decreased below the initial total dissolved Fe concentrations (Fe(II)total], 2.15 mM) due to fast adsorption within 0.2 day. The concentration of adsorbed Fe(II) (Fe(II)ads]) was determined as the difference between Fe(II)aq] and the concentration of extracted Fe(II) in 0.5 M HCl (Fe(II)extr]) (i.e., Fe(II)ads] = Fe(II)extr] ? Fe(II)aq]). Fe(II)ads] also decreased with time in experiments with and without DFAM, documenting that fast adsorption was accompanied by a second, slower reaction. Interestingly, Fe(II)extr] was always smaller than Fe(II)total], indicating that some Fe(II) was sequestered into a pool that is not HCl-extractable. The difference was attributed to Fe(II) incorporated into goethite structure (i.e., Fe(II)inc] = Fe(II)total] ?Fe(II)extr]). More Fe(II) was incorporated in the presence of DFAM than in its absence at all time steps. Regardless of the presence of DFAM, both aqueous and extracted Fe(II) (δ56/54Fe(II)aq and δ56/54Fe(II)extr) became isotopically lighter than or similar to goethite (? 0.27‰) at day 7, implying that the isotope exchange occurred between bulk goethite and aqueous Fe. Consistently, the mass balance indicated that the incorporated Fe is isotopically heavier than extracted Fe. These observations suggested that (i) co-adsorption of Fe(II) with DFAM resulted in more pervasive electron transfer, (ii) the electron transfer from heavy Fe(II) in the adsorbed Fe(II) to light Fe(III) in goethite results in the fixation of heavy adsorbed Fe(III) on the surface and accumulation of Fe(II) within the goethite, and (iii) desorption of the reduced, light Fe from goethite does not necessarily occur at the same surface sites where adsorption occurred.
Keywords:Iron  Isotope  Goethite  Adsorption  Electron transfer
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号