Reach-scale channel geometry of mountain streams |
| |
| Authors: | Ellen Wohl David M Merritt |
| |
| Institution: | aDepartment of Geosciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA;bNational Watershed, Fisheries, and Wildlife Program, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, 2150 Centre Avenue, Ft. Collins, CO 80526, USA;cNatural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | The basic patterns and processes of steep channels remain poorly known relative to lower-gradient channels. In this analysis, characteristics of step-pool, plane-bed, and pool-riffle channels are examined using a data set of 335 channel reaches from the western United States, Nepal, New Zealand, and Panama. We analyzed differences among the three channel types with respect to hydraulics, channel geometry, boundary roughness, and bedforms. Step-pool channels have significantly steeper gradients, coarser substrate, higher values of shear stress and stream power for a given discharge, and larger ratios of bedform amplitude/wavelength (H/L). Pool-riffle channels have greater width/depth ratios and relative grain submergence (R/D84) than the other channel types. Plane-bed channels tend to have intermediate values for most variables examined. Relative form submergence (R/H) is statistically similar for step-pool and pool-riffle channels. Despite the lesser relative grain submergence and greater bedform amplitude of step-pool channels, mean values of Darcy–Weisbach friction factor do not change in response to changes in relative grain submergence. These patterns suggest that adjustments along mountain streams effectively maximize resistance to flow and minimize downstream variability in resistance among the different channel types. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
