Patterns of controversy and consensus in German,Canadian, and US online news on climate change |
| |
| Institution: | 1. University of Amsterdam, Mr. Robin Tschötschel, REC C8.02, Valckenierstraat 59, 1018XE Amsterdam, the Netherlands;2. Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, the Netherlands |
| |
| Abstract: | Individual action and support for policy to tackle climate change have been linked to perceptions of political and scientific controversy and consensus concerning the issue. Recent media effects research indicates that presentation of agreement or conflict between actors’ opinions influences how audiences respond to news about climate change and policy. While some national case studies have investigated portrayals of actors’ positions on important questions regarding climate change in the media, they are largely absent from comparative research. This study addresses this gap by analysing portrayals of actor-issue-positions and the emerging patterns of controversy and consensus in German, Canadian, and US coverage. Studying a sample of occurrences of climate change-related issues (N = 902) in-depth, the results show German media present political consensus about the need to limit emissions and societal controversy about the efficacy of specific mitigation measures. Presenting mainly consensus, Canadian media report more on climate change’s impact, leaving aside the issue of efficacy. In the US, media emphasise political controversy — about the need to limit emissions and occasionally about climate change’s impact on humans. The findings, consistent with other recent publications, can best be explained by journalists selectively indexing of seemingly relevant actor-issue-positions. |
| |
| Keywords: | Climate change Controversy Consensus Online news coverage US Canada Germany |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
