| 一则更正和由此引发的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 廖卓庭.一则更正和由此引发的思考[J].安徽地质,2000(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 廖卓庭 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所!江苏 南京 210008 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 板溪群的地层时代到底是元古宙、古生代还是三叠纪？大地构造学家之间已持续争论了十多 年，争论的实际依据主要集中在所谓古生物化石的发现上。本文更正了争论中常被引为重要证据的一 则错误的化石鉴定结果，并解释了前因后果，同时呼吁就板溪群的地层时代归属和构造属性这一重大 基础地质问题开展多学科交叉配合的综合研究，特别是古生物学家应更积极地关注和参与到古生物化 石的证实工作中来。
|
| 关 键 词： | 古生物化石 地层时代 板溪群 |
A CORRECTION AND THE REFLECTION ON IT |
| |
| LIAO Zhuo - ting.A CORRECTION AND THE REFLECTION ON IT[J].Geology of Anhui,2000(1). |
| |
| Authors: | LIAO Zhuo - ting |
| |
| Abstract: | Does the Banxi Group belong to the Proterozoic or Paleozoic or Triassic? This controversy has continued among geotectologists for more than ten years. Typically they based on their individual discovery of paleotological fossils. In this paper a correction has been made on a wrong indentification for fossils that have been quoted as an important evidence in the controversy. The author explained how it happened and called for a polyacademic consideration on the Banxi Group in terms of stratigraphic age and tectonic attribute, particularly emphasized on that paleotologists should participate in it. |
| |
| Keywords: | palaeotological fossil stratigraphic age Banxi Group |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
