|
|||||
|
|
| 丝绸之路经济带沿线国家旅游资源与 入境旅游发展空间格局特征与差异 | |
| 引用本文： | 苏建军,关丽,张毓.丝绸之路经济带沿线国家旅游资源与 入境旅游发展空间格局特征与差异[J].世界地理研究,2021,30(3):509-519. |
| 作者姓名： | 苏建军 关丽 张毓 |
| 作者单位： | 西安科技大学管理学院，西安 710054 安徽大学商学院，合肥 230601 运城学院经济管理系，山西 运城 044000 |
| 基金项目： | 中国(西安)丝绸之路研究院项目(2018SY01);国家自然科学基金项目(42001170);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(20YJCZH237);陕西省社科基金项目(2019S054);陕西省哲学社会科学重大理论与现实问题研究年度一般项目(2021ND0237);陕西省体育科研常规课题(2020329);西安科技大学博士启动项目(2019QDJ026) |
| 摘 要： | 利用旅游资源丰度指数、旅游流质指数、空间一致性系数和二维矩阵等方法，定量比较分析了丝绸之路经济带沿线18个主要国家旅游资源丰度，入境旅游发展质量，以及旅游资源分布与入境旅游发展质量的空间格局特征与差异。研究表明：丝绸之路经济带沿线国家旅游资源数量与质量差异显著，正形成两极分化突出的格局，中西欧国家最优，中亚国家最弱，入境旅游发展质量也呈现出相似的特征。旅游资源资源分布与入境旅游发展质量，呈现较明显的弱协调性，旅游资源集聚具有较明显的国际旅游导向性，两者发生错位的国家超过三分之二。空间一致性表现为显著的区域差异特征，亚洲相对较好，中西欧次之，东欧最弱。为推进沿线国际旅游合作，提出如下建议：坚定“互联互通、平等包容和合作共赢”发展理念，成立国际旅游合作联盟，督促与落实相关战略部署与重点项目；在求同存异基础上，建立共享机制，提高国家间旅游合作一体化水平和协同发展程度；共同打造丝绸之路经济带世界级旅游线路与旅游资源品牌，着力提升国际旅游发展影响力。 |
| 关 键 词： | 丝绸之路经济带 旅游资源 入境旅游 空间格局 |
| 收稿时间： | 2019-12-25 |
| 修稿时间： | 2020-03-24 |
Research on spatial pattern characteristic and disparity of tourism resource and inbound tourism along the Silk Road Economic Belt |
|
| Jianjun SU,Li GUAN,Yu ZHANG.Research on spatial pattern characteristic and disparity of tourism resource and inbound tourism along the Silk Road Economic Belt[J].World Regional Studies,2021,30(3):509-519. | |
| Authors: | Jianjun SU Li GUAN Yu ZHANG |
| Institution: | School of Management, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China Department of Economic and Management, Yuncheng University, Yuncheng 044000, China |
| Abstract: | Based on the theory of spatial mismatch, using tourism resource abundance index, and 2D matrix method, the papers analyzes and compares the tourism resource degree, inbound tourism quality, and their spatial pattern character and disparity among eighteen countries in the Silk Road Economic Belt. The main results are followed: Firstly, the quantity and quality of tourism resource are clearly polarized along the Silk Road Economic Belt, Western Europe is the best, such as Germany, UK, Italy and France, they have many tourism resource of various types and high quality, and Central Asia is the weakest including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan. Because their tourism resources are single, there are relatively few opportunities for tourism cooperation between countries in Central Asia. Inbound tourism development quality also shows similar characteristics. Secondly, from the two dimensional matrix, tourism resource distribution and inbound tourism quality show a weaker coordination trend, and the typical characteristic is that the tourism resource concentration is slightly higher than that of the inbound tourism development. The accumulation of tourism resource has obvious international tourism orientation, and more than two-thirds of the countries occurred mismatch in the Silk Road Economic Belt, among them the countries where the occurred mismatch ar those in Central Europe and Western Asia. Russia and India obviously occur mismatch, but Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan do not occur mismatch. Inbound tourism level needs to be improved in high mismatch countries. At last, spatial consistency characteristic is significantly regional difference in four areas. It always shows that tourism resource concentration is higher than that of the inbound tourism. Asia is relatively the best, Central Europe is better and Eastern Europe is the worst.Suggestions are as follows: to firm the development concept of "interconnection, equality, tolerance, cooperation and win-win"; to establish an international tourism cooperation alliance, supervise and implement relevant strategic deployment and key projects; to build a sharing mechanism based on seeking common ground while shelving differences, substantially improve the level of tourism cooperation and integration between countries and degree of coordinated development; to create world-class tourism routes and tourism resource famous brands in Silk Road Economic Belt, and enhance the influence and level of international tourism development. |
| Keywords: | the Silk Road Economic Belt tourism resource inbound tourism spatial pattern |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ | |
| 点击此处可从《世界地理研究》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《世界地理研究》下载免费的PDF全文 | |