| 东北三省收缩城市城乡一体化收缩效应及其作用机理研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙平军,张可秋,何田.东北三省收缩城市城乡一体化收缩效应及其作用机理研究[J].地理科学进展,2022,41(7):1213-1225. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙平军 张可秋 何田 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南大学地理科学学院,重庆 400715 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社科基金项目(21XJC790010);重庆英才基金项目(2021YC024) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 城乡一体化对中国乡村振兴和城市—区域可持续发展的有效落实有重要意义,但当前快速城镇化发展进程中涌现了一批收缩型城市,其城乡一体化发展有什么特征、城市收缩是否对城乡一体化产生影响、产生什么样的影响等,成为新时期推进全民共同富裕目标研究中的核心科学问题。论文据此基于“城镇发展带动—产业发展与投入城乡协调—推进基本公共服务均衡和城乡收入差距缩小”的“动力—路径—目标”对城乡一体化内涵进行界定、构建评价指标体系,并以东北三省为例,从收缩城市与非收缩城市、收缩城市不同发展阶段、不同发展类型视角,对2010—2019年期间的城乡关系展开实证分析。结果表明：① 东北三省城乡一体化发展情况整体呈上升趋势,但整体发展水平较低且内部空间分异明显。② 城市收缩对城乡一体化发展表征出较为明显的影响,收缩城市的城乡一体化水平整体较非收缩城市要低、城乡二元结构特征更为明显。③ 收缩城市的城乡一体化发展水平存在收缩类型、收缩发展阶段的差异性：其城乡一体化水平由收缩初期阶段向收缩后期阶段逐渐降低,收缩类型上表征出资源依赖型收缩城市<综合型收缩城市<虹吸型收缩城市<区位制约型收缩城市的发展特征。故此得出收缩城市源于发展要素被“空间剥夺”而对城乡一体化发展产生影响,收缩城市的涌现不利于区域协调、城乡一体化融合发展,东北振兴中应充分考虑收缩城市的可持续发展问题。
|
| 关 键 词： | 城乡一体化 收缩效应 城市收缩 收缩城市 东北三省 |
| 收稿时间： | 2022-01-10 |
| 修稿时间： | 2022-03-24 |
Shrinkage effect of urban-rural integration on shrinking cities in the three provinces of Northeast China and mechanism |
| |
| SUN Pingjun,ZHANG Keqiu,HE Tian.Shrinkage effect of urban-rural integration on shrinking cities in the three provinces of Northeast China and mechanism[J].Progress in Geography,2022,41(7):1213-1225. |
| |
| Authors: | SUN Pingjun ZHANG Keqiu HE Tian |
| |
| Institution: | School of Geography Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Urban-rural integration has great significance for the effective implementation of rural revitalization and urban sustainable development in China, but shrinking cities have emerged in the process of rapid urbanization. Characteristics of urban-rural integration development of shrinking cities and the impact of urban shrinkage on urban-rural integration have become one of the core scientific issues to be addressed in the current research on promoting the goal of common prosperity in China. This study constructed an evaluation indicator system based on the definition of urban-rural integration, with the driving force-pathway-goal of "urban development driven-coordination of urban and rural investment-promoting the balance of basic public services and narrowing urban-rural income gaps". It took the three northeastern provinces as examples and conducted an empirical analysis of urban-rural relationship in 2010-2019 from the perspective of shrinking cities and non-shrinking cities, different development stages, and different development types of shrinking cities. The results show that: 1) The overall development of urban-rural integration in the three northeastern provinces showed an upward trend, but the development level is still low and the internal spatial differentiation is obvious. 2) Urban shrinkage has an obvious impact on urban-rural integration, and the overall level of urban-rural integration in shrinking cities is lower than that of non-shrinking cities. Urban and rural dual structure is more obvious in shrinking cities. 3) Urban-rural integration development level shows differences in cities of different shrinkage types and shrinkage development stages. The level of urban-rural integration decreased gradually from pre-shrinkage stage to post-shrinkage stage, and resource-dependent shrinking cities < comprehensive shrinking cities < "siphon" shrinking cities < location-constrained shrinking cities. Therefore, this study concluded that shrinking cities are affected by the "spatial deprivation" of development factors on urban-rural integration development. The emergence of shrinking cities is not conducive to regional coordination and the integration of urban and rural development, and the sustainable development of shrinking cities should be fully considered in the revitalization of Northeast China. |
| |
| Keywords: | urban-rural integration shrinkage effects urban shrinkage shrinking cities the three provinces of Northeast China |
|
| 点击此处可从《地理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学进展》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
