|
|||||
|
|
| 国家公园群建设的层级结构识别——以青藏高原国家公园群为例 | |
| 引用本文： | 曾瑜皙,钟林生,虞虎.国家公园群建设的层级结构识别——以青藏高原国家公园群为例[J].地理科学进展,2022,41(6):972-984. |
| 作者姓名： | 曾瑜皙 钟林生 虞虎 |
| 作者单位： | 1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101 2.中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京 100049 |
| 基金项目： | 第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0401);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA20020302);中国博士后科学基金项目(2020M680659) |
| 摘 要： | 层级结构识别是推进国家公园群建设的基础工作。然而,已有研究较少关注国家公园群层级结构定量识别。论文结合理论分析与多准则分析方法,提出国家公园群建设层级结构识别的UBAN框架(uniqueness, biodiversity, aesthetic value, naturalness),并以青藏高原国家公园群为例进行实证分析。研究表明,青藏高原国家公园群内部单体之间存在较大差异,长江源的相对重要性最高,海西盐湖最低。层级划分方案对比分析显示,采用“四分法”有助于推进分层管理。据此方案,青藏高原国家公园群的一级单体包括长江源等5个,二级单体包括帕米尔等6个,三级单体包括普达措等4个,四级单体包括贡嘎山等6个,不同层级在青藏高原国家公园群建设中的优先顺序、建设重点和策略不同。研究强调了国家公园群层级识别的必要性,提出并验证了UBAN框架在国家公园群层级结构识别中的可行性,有助于推动国家公园群建设管理策略制定和目标实现。 |
| 关 键 词： | 国家公园群 层级结构 多准则分析 青藏高原 |
| 收稿时间： | 2021-11-12 |
| 修稿时间： | 2022-03-25 |
Hierarchical structure identification of national park groups: Taking the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park Group as an example |
|
| ZENG Yuxi,ZHONG Linsheng,YU Hu.Hierarchical structure identification of national park groups: Taking the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park Group as an example[J].Progress in Geography,2022,41(6):972-984. | |
| Authors: | ZENG Yuxi ZHONG Linsheng YU Hu |
| Institution: | 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China 2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
| Abstract: | Hierarchical structure identification is important for the construction of national park groups. However, existing studies have paid little attention to the method for the identification of hierarchical structure of national park groups. This study proposed the UBAN framework (Uniqueness, Biodiversity, Aesthetic value, Naturalness) for the identification of park hierarchy in national park groups through theoretical analysis and multi-criteria analysis methods, and applied the framework to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park Group for testing its feasibility and validation. The results show that the UBAN framework is feasible and easy to operationalize in identifying hierarchical structure of the national park group. Among the 21 national parks, the Source of the Yangtze River has the highest relative importance, followed by Mount Everest and Giant Pandas. The large difference in relative importance within the national park group is attributed to differences in various dimensions. When the four-level structure is adopted, the overall difference is mainly caused by the differences between the levels rather than the differences within each level, suggesting that the four-level structure is suitable for national park group management based on the characteristics of each level. In the four-level structure, the first level includes the Source of the Yangtze River, Mount Everest, Giant Pandas, Selincuo-Puruogangri, and the Source of the Yellow River. Parks at this level have the highest ecosystem uniqueness, biodiversity, aesthetic value, and naturalness, and plays a central role in the construction of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park Group. The second-level includes Pamirs, Brahmaputra Grand Canyon, Sacred Mountain and Holy Lake, Qilian Mountains, the Source of the Lancang River, and Kunlun Mountains-Hoh Xil. Parks at this level have high ecosystem uniqueness, biodiversity, aesthetic value, and naturalness, and should be further optimized in the construction of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park Group. The third-level includes Pudacuo, Daocheng Yading, Ruoergai, and Zanda Earth Forest. Parks at this level have moderate ecosystem uniqueness and biodiversity, and should be characteristically developed in the construction of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park Group. The fourth-level includes Yadan, Gongga Mountain, West Tianshan, Dulong River-Three Parallel Rivers, Zari Mountain, and Haixi Salt Lake. Parks at this level have lower ecosystem uniqueness, biodiversity, aesthetic value, and naturalness, and should be given significant supports in the construction of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park Group. This study contributes to the national park group structure theory and offers implications for the construction practices of national park groups. |
| Keywords: | national park group hierarchy multi-criteria analysis Qinghai-Tibet Plateau |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学进展》下载免费的PDF全文 | |