|
|||||
|
|
| 领土VS主权：政治地理学领土陷阱理论研究进展 | |
| 引用本文： | 刘云刚,刘玄宇,王丰龙,胡寻寻.领土VS主权：政治地理学领土陷阱理论研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2022,41(8):1492-1503. |
| 作者姓名： | 刘云刚 刘玄宇 王丰龙 胡寻寻 |
| 作者单位： | 1.华南师范大学地理科学学院/亚洲地理研究中心,广州 510631 2.华南师范大学行政区划与空间治理研究中心,广州 510631 3.华南师范大学北斗研究院,广东 佛山 5282252 4.中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广州 510275 |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目(42142028);国家自然科学基金项目(42071187);国家自然科学基金项目(42171225);国家社会科学基金项目(20VHQ002) |
| 摘 要： | 领土/领域是政治地理学的核心概念,领土陷阱是政治地理学的经典理论之一。论文系统整理了关于领土陷阱的成果文献,在此基础上梳理了领土陷阱理论的源起、发展及其研究议题进展,并对其借鉴意义进行了评述。John Agnew提出的领土陷阱理论基于3个地理假设：领土—国家—主权的“三位一体”、国内—国外的“二分法”、国家是社会的容器。领土陷阱驳斥了既有的国家中心主义领土观,强调重视领土主权之外的多种实效主权形式,如域外治权、分级主权、社会主权等。领土陷阱如今被广泛应用于全球治理、非传统安全、跨境移民、跨境资源保护、跨境水政治等多方面的议题,并随着时代发展展示出其强大的解释力。论文认为,领土陷阱相关研究的主张,如领土是主权的工具、要从领土主权和实效主权的复杂互动中理解领土问题、从中心和边缘的双向视角理解领土问题、从理性和历史情感中审视领土问题等,对于中国当下有效解决领土问题、推动“一带一路”倡议、践行“人类命运共同体”等具有重要的启示意义。 |
| 关 键 词： | 领土陷阱 领域性 领土国家 实效主权 政治地理 |
| 收稿时间： | 2021-11-19 |
| 修稿时间： | 2022-05-05 |
Territory versus sovereignty: A review of the “territorial trap” studies in political geography |
|
| LIU Yungang,LIU Xuanyu,WANG Fenglong,HU Xunxun.Territory versus sovereignty: A review of the “territorial trap” studies in political geography[J].Progress in Geography,2022,41(8):1492-1503. | |
| Authors: | LIU Yungang LIU Xuanyu WANG Fenglong HU Xunxun |
| Institution: | 1. School of Geography & The Center for Asian Geographical Studies, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China 2. The Center of Administrative Division and Spatial Governance, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China 3. Beidou Research Institute, South China Normal University, Foshan 528225, Guangdong, China 4. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China |
| Abstract: | Territory is the key concept in political geography, and territorial trap is one of the most classical theories in political geography. This article systematically reviewed the literature on territorial traps, summarized the origin, development, and research progress of the territorial trap theory, and discussed its significance in Chinese political geographical studies. The theory of territorial trap proposed by Agnew is based on three geographical assumptions: the "trinity" of territory-state-sovereignty, the "dichotomy" of domestic-foreign, and the state as a social container. The territorial trap theory refutes the existing state-centric view of territory and emphasizes various effective forms of sovereignty besides the state's territory, such as extraterritorial sovereignty, graduated sovereignty, and social sovereignty. The extensive application of the territorial trap theory reflects its strong explanatory power in global governance, non-traditional security, cross-border migration control, cross-border resource protection, cross-border water politics, and so forth. This article argued that territorial issues should be understood from the complex interaction between territorial control and effective sovereignty and the perspectives from the center and periphery, and be examined by combining rationality and historical emotion. It has important implications for China to effectively resolve territorial issues, promote the realization of the Belt and Road Initiative, and establish the "community with a shared future for mankind". |
| Keywords: | territorial trap territoriality territorial state effective sovereignty political geography |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学进展》下载免费的PDF全文 | |