Evolution of the Palaeotethys in the Eastern Mediterranean: a multi-method approach to unravel the age,provenance and tectonic setting of the Upper Palaeozoic Konya Complex and its Mesozoic cover sequence (south-central Turkey) |
| |
| Authors: | Kersten Löwen Guido Meinhold Arzu Arslan Talip Güngör Jasper Berndt |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Abteilung Sedimentologie/Umweltgeologie, Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum G?ttingen, Universit?t G?ttingen, G?ttingen, Germanykersten.loewen@geo.uni-goettingen.de;3. Abteilung Sedimentologie/Umweltgeologie, Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum G?ttingen, Universit?t G?ttingen, G?ttingen, Germany;4. School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-8375;5. School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UKhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1556-9166;6. Department of Geological Engineering, Dokuz Eylül University, Buca-?zmir, Turkey;7. Institute of Mineralogy, Westf?lische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany |
| |
| Abstract: | ABSTRACTSiliciclastic sediments from the Upper Palaeozoic Konya Complex and its Mesozoic cover were studied by a multi-method approach combining thin-section petrography, bulk-rock geochemistry, mineral chemistry of rutile, and U–Pb geochronology of detrital zircons. Provenance sensitive data of samples from the Upper Palaeozoic Hal?c? Formation indicate sediment supply from mainly low- to medium-grade metamorphosed sedimentary rocks of felsic character, while the contribution from volcanic rocks was rare. The detrital zircon record of sediments from the Hal?c? Formation documents sediment supply from different sources and excludes a similar provenance. Some samples show great similarities with Palaeozoic sandstones from the cover sequence of the Saharan Metacraton and the Arabian–Nubian Shield, while the other samples indicate a provenance that must be sought in units with a southern Eurasian affinity. The upper limit for sediment deposition in the Hal?c? Formation is mostly constrained by Early Palaeozoic zircon populations; however, sediment accumulation in Pennsylvanian–Cisuralian time is more likely, contemporaneously with the Upper Palaeozoic succession on the Karaburun Peninsula (western Turkey). The provenance of sediments from the Upper Triassic Ard?çl? Formation remains enigmatic, but the source should be sought nonetheless in units close to the depositional site. In any case, detrital zircon age spectra and compositional data exclude recycling of underlying rock units (i.e. Hal?c? Formation). Overall, our new provenance data reveal great similarities between the Konya Complex and comparable units (Chios, Karaburun) but also highlight distinct differences in terms of sediment composition and provenance. |
| |
| Keywords: | Palaeotethys Turkey Konya Complex sediment provenance U-Pb geochronology whole-rock geochemistry rutile geochemistry |
|
|
![ORCID Icon]({"type":"image","src":"/templates/jsp/images/orcid.png"} "ORCID Icon")
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-8375;5. School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK