| 几种主要碳增汇/减排途径的对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王礼茂.几种主要碳增汇/减排途径的对比分析[J].第四纪研究,2004,24(2):191-197. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王礼茂 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100101 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中国科学院知识创新工程重大项目(批准号:KZCX1-SW -0 1-18)，国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(批准号:2 0 0 2CB412 5 0 8)资助 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 植树造林、节能、改善农业管理和征收碳税都是碳汇减排的重要途径,但不同途径的碳汇减排潜力和成本是不同的,对经济的影响程度也是不同的。通过不同减排方案的对比和对经济影响的分析,认为植树造林、节能和农田管理在中国有较大的碳汇减排潜力,而碳税与上述几种途径相比减排效果相对较差,而且在中国实施有一定的难度
|
| 关 键 词： | 碳排放 增汇/减排 途径 比较 成本效益 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-7410(2004)02-191-07 |
| 收稿时间： | 2003-08-10 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年8月10日 |
COMPARISON OF SOME MAJOR WAYS REDUCING CARBON EMISSION OR INCREASING CARBON SINK |
| |
| Wang Limao.COMPARISON OF SOME MAJOR WAYS REDUCING CARBON EMISSION OR INCREASING CARBON SINK[J].Quaternary Sciences,2004,24(2):191-197. |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Limao |
| |
| Institution: | Institute of Geographical Science and Natural Resource, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101 |
| |
| Abstract: | There are many ways, such as afforestation, energy saving, improving agricultural management and levying a tax etc., in order either to reduce carbon emission or to increase carbon sink. The effectiveness and thriftiness are two main factors that should be taken into consideration when certain measurements were selected. By comparative study on several different ways, our conclusion is that tree planting, energy saving and improving agricultural management are the ways with large benefit and less lost. As for levying a tax on carbon emission it seems less effective and may cause some unexpected problems for developing countries like China. |
| |
| Keywords: | carbon emission carbon sinks/carbon mitigation ways comparison cost benefit |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《第四纪研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《第四纪研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
