|
|||||
|
|
GHG mitigation of agricultural peatlands requires coherent policies |
|
| Authors: | Kristiina Regina Arif Budiman Mogens H Greve Arne Grønlund Åsa Kasimir Heikki Lehtonen |
| Institution: | 1. Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Natural Resources and Bioproduction, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finlandkristiina.regina@luke.fi;3. WWF Indonesia, Gedung Graha Simatupang Tower 2 Unit C lantai 10, Jalan LetJen TB Simatupang, Jakarta 12540, Indonesia;4. Dept. Agroecology, Aarhus University, P.O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark;5. Bioforsk, Frederik A. Dahls vei 20, ?s, Norway;6. Dept. Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 460, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden;7. Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Economics and Society, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790 Helsinki, Finland |
| Abstract: | As soon as peat soil is drained for agricultural production, the peat starts to degrade, which causes emissions to the atmosphere. In countries with large peatland areas, the GHG mitigation potential related to management of these soils is often estimated as the highest amongst the measures available in agriculture. Although the facts are well known, the policies leading to diminished emissions are often difficult to implement. We have analysed the reasons why the mitigation potential is not fully utilized and what could be done better in national implementation of climate policies. Four cases are used to illustrate the necessary steps to reach mitigation targets: determining the amount and properties of peat soils, estimating the potential, costs and feasibility of the mitigation measures, and selecting and implementing the best measures. A common feature for all of the cases was that national and international climate policies have increased the public interest in GHG emissions from peat soils and increased the pressure for mitigation. Basically the same factors restrict the implementation of mitigation measures in all countries with significant peat soil areas. The most important of these is lack of policy coherence, e.g. ignoring climate policies when planning land use or agricultural policies. We conclude that GHG mitigation is achieved only if other policies, especially national regulations and strategies, are in line with climate policies. Policy relevance Agricultural peat soils could be used to help reach GHG mitigation goals in many countries, but the full potential of mitigation of peat soils is not used. Although peatland cultivation inevitably leads to loss of the whole peat layer and high emissions, there are few incentives or regulation to effectively minimize these losses. This article discusses the possibilities to reduce GHG emissions from agricultural peat soils, with specific emphasis on the barriers of implementing mitigation measures nationally. The lessons learned from the selected cases emphasize the role of all policy makers and their cooperation in planning coherent policies for achieving the goals determined by climate policies. |
| Keywords: | agriculture GHG land use mitigation peat policies |