Comparison of horizontal ground displacements in Avonside area,Christchurch from air photo,LiDAR and satellite measurements regarding pipeline damage assessment |
| |
| Authors: | S Toprak E Nacaroglu A C Koc T D O’Rourke M Hamada M Cubrinovski S Van Ballegooy |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Global Construction Ltd.,Tekirdag,Turkey;2.Civil Engineering Department,Pamukkale University,Denizli,Turkey;3.School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Cornell University,Ithaca,USA;4.Department of Civil and Environment Engineering,Waseda University,Tokyo,Japan;5.Department of Civil Engineering,University of Canterbury,Christchurch,New Zealand;6.Tonkin?+?Taylor Ltd,Auckland,New Zealand |
| |
| Abstract: | Recent earthquakes show that pipeline damage is severe in the areas where permanent ground deformations (e.g., liquefaction zones) occur. Ground movement hazard to pipeline systems can be assessed by using ground displacement measurements around the location of pipelines. There are many different ways of measuring ground displacements after an earthquake occur. This paper compares displacements measured in Avonside area, Christchurch, NZ, by using four different ways with respect to their effects on pipeline damage assessments. They are air photo, satellite, high resolution light detection and ranging (LiDAR) surveys data presented at 4- and 56-m grids acquired before and after the Mw6.2 22 February 2011 earthquake. Avonside area was in the liquefaction zones of the 22 February 2011 earthquake. Where possible, benchmark measurements were also included in the comparisons. In this study, the focus was on asbestos cement and cast iron water pipelines as the length of the pipelines and the number of damages in the study area was much higher compared to other pipe materials, providing sufficient repair rate data passing the screening criteria to develop linear regressions. The correlations between pipeline damage and lateral ground strains were developed by calculating the horizontal strains from these four different type displacements. The comparisons show that satellite imagery is good for estimating total movements but not so good for estimating lateral strains and conversely LiDAR surveys are not so good for estimating total movements, but much better for estimating lateral strains. Hence, pipeline damage correlations with LiDAR calculated strains provide higher determination coefficient (r2) value. The results of comparisons are presented and discussed. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
