首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

LEO GPS接收机仪器偏差估计
引用本文:林剑,吴云,熊晶,祝芙英,杨剑.LEO GPS接收机仪器偏差估计[J].地球物理学报,2010,53(5):1034-1038.
作者姓名:林剑  吴云  熊晶  祝芙英  杨剑
作者单位:1.中国地震局地震研究所, 武汉 430071;2.武汉大学卫星导航定位技术研究中心, 武汉 430079
基金项目:国家支撑项目(2008BAC35B02),国家863项目(2007AA12Z169)和中国地震局地震研究所所长基金“LEO GPS电离层反演技术”资助.
摘    要:LEO GPS观测已成为空间电离层研究重要手段之一,通过GPS双频观测值获取的TEC则是电离层探测的一个重要参量,为获取高精度TEC需估计和消除GPS接收机仪器偏差(DCB).本文旨在探索一种全新的LEO GPS接收机仪器偏差的估计方法:基于电离层球对称的假设,利用CHAMP和COSMIC原始GPS观测数据,采用几何映射函数,通过最小二乘解算出GPS接收机仪器偏差.结果表明:(1)2008年1月份期间,通过上述方法解算的仪器偏差都较稳定,相比COSMIC网上发布结果,标准偏差都在0.6 ns以内;(2)COSMIC(轨道高度大约800 km)仪器偏差估计结果优于CHAMP(轨道高度大约400 km)的结果,原因为:对于不同轨道高度LEO GPS仪器偏差估计,其较高轨道高度的电离层球对称假设影响较小.

关 键 词:GPS  电子总含量(TEC)  仪器偏差  电离层球对称  CHAMP  COSMIC  
收稿时间:2009-06-30
修稿时间:2010-01-26

Estimation of LEO GPS receiver instrument biases
LIN Jian,WU Yun,XIONG Jing,ZHU Fu-Ying,YANG Jian.Estimation of LEO GPS receiver instrument biases[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2010,53(5):1034-1038.
Authors:LIN Jian  WU Yun  XIONG Jing  ZHU Fu-Ying  YANG Jian
Institution:1.Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Wuhan 430071, China;2.Research Center of Satellite Navigation and Positioning Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 400079, China
Abstract:The GPS LEO measurements have become a powerful tool for special ionospheric studies, and TEC derived from GPS dual frequency measurements is an important parameter in ionospheric detection. The GPS receiver instrument biases (often called differential code biases (DCB)) must be estimated and eliminated from the data in order to obtain precise TEC. The objective of this paper is to grope for a brand-new method of estimation of LEO GPS receiver instrument biases: based on the assumption of spherical symmetry of ionosphere, utilizing raw GPS observation data from CHAMP and COSMIC, applying geometric mapping function, the instrument biases could be calculated by least-square technique. The results show that: (1) during Jan.1~31,2008, the DCB calculated by above method were stable, and compared with the web-published result of COSMIC all the standard deviations were less than 0.6 ns; (2) the estimated DCB of COSMIC (orbit altitude about 800 km) were better than that of CHAMP (orbit altitude about 400 km), the reason is that for estimation of DCB at different LEO orbit altitudes, the effects of spherical symmetry of ionosphere at higher orbit altitude were less.
Keywords:GPS  CHAMP  COSMIC
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地球物理学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地球物理学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号