| 矿业投资估价的DCF法与ROV法之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 廖作鸿,李培亮.矿业投资估价的DCF法与ROV法之比较[J].地质学刊,2002,26(3):185-187. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 廖作鸿 李培亮 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南方冶金学院 江西赣州341000
(廖作鸿)，南方冶金学院 江西赣州341000(李培亮) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 矿业投资领域的矿产品价格波动大，投资不确定性高，从而直接影响矿业投资估价。分别阐述了矿业投资估价的DCF法与ROV法优缺点，并通过案例予以说明。
|
| 关 键 词： | 矿业投资估价 折现现金流法 实物期权 |
| 文章编号： | 1003-6474(2002)03-0185-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年8月13日 |
Comparison of DCF and ROV Method for Evaluation of Mining Investment |
| |
| LIAO Zuo-hong,LI Pei liang.Comparison of DCF and ROV Method for Evaluation of Mining Investment[J].Jiangsu Geology,2002,26(3):185-187. |
| |
| Authors: | LIAO Zuo-hong LI Pei liang |
| |
| Abstract: | In the fields of mineral investment,the prices of mineral are extremely volatile,uncertain and undesirable,which directly affect the investment assessment of mining industry.The flaws and merits of the DCF and ROV technique in miming investment evaluation in the text are narrated respectively,and the comparison is conducted through a case study. |
| |
| Keywords: | Evaluation of mining investment discounted cash flow Real options |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《地质学刊》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《地质学刊》下载免费的PDF全文 |
