Flow depletion in a small stream caused by ground water abstraction from wells |
| |
| Authors: | Nyholm Thomas Christense Steen Rasmussen Keld R |
| |
| Institution: | Department of Earth Sciences, University of Aarhus. Current address: The Environmental Section at The County of Aarhus, Lyseng Alle 1, DK-8200 H0jbjerg, Denmark;+45 89446730;;Department of Earth Sciences, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade Bldg. 520, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark;+45 8942 3643, fax +45 8618 0037;; |
| |
| Abstract: | The interaction between a gaining stream and a water-table aquifer is studied at an outwash plain. The aquifer is hydraulically well connected to the stream. Pumping tests were carried out in 1997 and 1998 in two wells 60 m from the stream, screening different depths of the aquifer. Drawdown was measured on both sides of the stream. Hydraulic head, drawdown, and stream depletion data were analyzed using numerical flow models. Similar models were fitted to each of two different data sets: Model A was fitted to steady-state hydraulic head and streamflow gain data not influenced by pumping; and model B was fitted to drawdown data measured during the 1998 pumping test. Each calibrated model closely fits its calibration data; however, predictions were biased if model A was used to predict the calibration data of model B, and vice versa. To further test the models, they were used to predict streamflow depletion during the two pumping tests as well as the drawdown during the 1997 test. Neither of these data were used for calibration. Model A predicted the measured depletions fairly accurately during both tests, whereas the predicted drawdowns in 1997 were significantly larger than actually measured. Contrary to this, the 1997 drawdowns predicted by model B were nearly unbiased; the predicted depletions deviate significantly from the measured depletions in 1997, but they compare well with the observations in 1998. Thus, although field work and analyses were extensive and done carefully to develop a ground water flow model that could predict both drawdown and streamflow depletion, the model predictions are biased. Analyses indicate that the deviations between model and data may be because of error in the models' representations of either the release of water from storage or of the hydrology in the riparian zone. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录！ |
|
