首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

3种远震P波到时拾取方法的比较及其参数优化
引用本文:刘畅,靳平,李欣.3种远震P波到时拾取方法的比较及其参数优化[J].地震学报,2018,40(4):419-429.
作者姓名:刘畅  靳平  李欣
作者单位:中国西安 710024 西北核技术研究所
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41474035)资助
摘    要:分析了自回归赤池信息准则(AR-AIC)、高阶统计量(HOS)和累积和(CUSUM)等3种到时拾取方法中参数对远震P波到时估计的影响,以450个远震P波信号为样本集,参考人工拾取到时,以网格搜索方式确定了每种方法的最优参数。之后重新选取信噪比处于2,20]区间的100个远震P波信号,用确定最优参数后的3种到时拾取方法估计其P波初至时间,并比较了3种方法对低信噪比远震P波的拾取准确度。结果表明,AR-AIC方法和CUSUM方法对低信噪比远震P波的拾取准确度要优于HOS方法,CUSUM方法的计算速度最快,HOS方法由于其原理的限制更适用于信噪比较大、初动较尖锐的信号。 

关 键 词:到时拾取    自回归赤池信息准则(AR-AIC)方法    高阶统计量(HOS)方法    累积和(CUSUM)方法
收稿时间:2017-08-15

A comparative study on three methods of onset-time determination for teleseismic P arrivals and parameters optimization
Institution:Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology,Xi’an 710024,China
Abstract:This paper analyzed the effect of parameters on estimation of onset times for teleseismic P waves by AR-AIC (auto-regression Akaike information criterion), HOS (higher order statistics) and CUSUM (cumulative sums) methods. The parameters of each method were optimized in the way of grid searching by taking 450 teleseismic P phases as sample set and the manual picked arrival times as reference. And then 100 teleseismic P phases were reselected with SNR between 2 and 20, and the onset times were estimated by the three methods with optimized parameters, so as to evaluate the accuracy of estimation for low-SNR teleseismic P phases. The results show that the accuracy of estimated phase arrival times by the AR-AIC and CUSUM methods is better than by the HOS method, the calculation speed by the CUSUM method is the fastest, and the HOS method is better applied to high-SNR and sharp onset signals. 
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地震学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地震学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号