| 基于不同设定地震方法的长周期建筑设计反应谱的对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 徐丹丹,吕悦军,陈阳,潘龙.基于不同设定地震方法的长周期建筑设计反应谱的对比分析[J].中国地震研究,2014,28(3):403-412. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 徐丹丹 吕悦军 陈阳 潘龙 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国地震局地壳应力研究所，北京 100085;北京市勘察技术工程有限公司，北京 100038;北京市勘察技术工程有限公司，北京 100038;北京市勘察技术工程有限公司，北京 100038;北京市勘察技术工程有限公司，北京 100038 |
| |
| 基金项目： | This project is funded by the Basic Scientific Research and Business Item of Central Public -interest Scientific Institution, China （ZDJ2012-12）. |
| |
| 摘 要： | Two kinds of determining methods for scenario earthquakes are presented in this paper, namely the weighted average method and maximum probability method. This paper briefly introduces the two methods, then taking a high-rise building in the Yantai area as a case study, we use the weighted average method and maximum probability method to realize seismic hazard analysis, determine earthquake magnitude, the epicenter and specific space position, and then give two response spectrums of the two methods. By comparing the differences of response spectrums between the two methods, we find that the weighted average method is more suitable for long period structures, while considering long period safety. The maximum probability method is more suitable for short period structures. It is reasonable to choose a corresponding different method when the structures have different natural vibration periods.
|
| 关 键 词： | 设计反应谱 结构比较 长周期 地震危险性分析 加权平均法 最大概率 烟台地区 高层建筑 |
| 收稿时间： | 2013/3/16 0:00:00 |
Comparison of Design Response Spectrum for Long Period Structures Based on Scenario Earthquakes |
| |
| Xu Dandan,Lv Yuejun,Chen Yang and Pan Long.Comparison of Design Response Spectrum for Long Period Structures Based on Scenario Earthquakes[J].Earthquake Research in China,2014,28(3):403-412. |
| |
| Authors: | Xu Dandan Lv Yuejun Chen Yang and Pan Long |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Institute of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100085, China ; BGI Engineering Consultants LTD., Beijing 100038, China
2. Institute of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100085, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Two kinds of determining methods for scenario earthquakes are presented in this paper, namely the weighted average method and maximum probability method. This paper briefly introduces the two methods, then taking a high rise building in the Yantai area as a case study, we use the weighted average method and maximum probability method to realize seismic hazard analysis, determine earthquake magnitude, the epicenter and specific space position, and then give two response spectrums of the two methods. By comparing the differences of response spectrums between the two methods, we find that the weighted average method is more suitable for long period structures, while considering long period safety. The maximum probability method is more suitable for short period structures. It is reasonable to choose a corresponding different method when the structures have different natural vibration periods. |
| |
| Keywords: | Long period Scenario earthquake Weighted average method Maximum probability method Response spectrum |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《中国地震研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国地震研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
