Estimating surface sublimation losses from snowpacks in a mountain catchment using eddy covariance and turbulent transfer calculations |
| |
| Authors: | Michele L Reba John Pomeroy Danny Marks Timothy E Link |
| |
| Institution: | 1. National Sedimentation Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, , Jonesboro, AR, USA;2. Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, , Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada;3. Agricultural Research Service, Northwest Watershed Research Center, , Boise, ID, USA;4. College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, , Moscow, ID, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Sublimation is a critical component of the snow cover mass balance. Although sublimation can be directly measured using eddy covariance (EC), such measurements are relatively uncommon in complex mountainous environments. The EC measurements of surface snowpack sublimation from three consecutive winter seasons (2004, 2005 and 2006) at a wind‐exposed and wind‐sheltered site were analysed to characterise sublimation in mountainous terrain. During the 2006 snow season, snow surface and near‐surface air temperature, humidity and wind were also measured, permitting the calculation of sublimation rates and a comparison with EC measurements. This comparison showed that measured and simulated sublimation was very similar at the exposed site but less so at the sheltered site. Wind speeds at the exposed site were nearly four times than that at the sheltered site, and the exposed site yielded measured sublimation that was two times the magnitude of that at the sheltered site. The time variation of measured sublimation showed diurnal increases in the early afternoon and increased rates overall as the snow season progressed. Measured mean daily sublimation rates were 0.39 and 0.15 mm day?1 at the exposed and sheltered sites, respectively. At the exposed site, measured sublimation accounted for 16% and 41% of the maximum snow accumulation in 2006 and 2005, respectively. At the sheltered site, measured seasonal sublimation was approximately 4% in 2004 and 2006 and 8% in 2005 of the maximum snow water equivalent. Simulated sublimation was only available for 2006 and suggested smaller but comparable percentages to the sublimation estimated from observations. At the exposed site, a total of 42 mm sublimated for the snow season, which constituted 12% of the maximum accumulation. At the sheltered site, 17 mm (2.2% of maximum accumulation) was sublimated over the snow season. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
| Keywords: | eddy covariance snow sublimation |
|
|
