| 地震安全性评价中的多方案比较工作方法 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘建达,黄永林.地震安全性评价中的多方案比较工作方法[J].震灾防御技术,2006,1(1):47-55. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘建达 黄永林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 江苏省地震工程研究院,南京中山门外卫岗3号,南京 210014 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在对秦山核电二期工程建设项目地震动参数的复核中采用了多方案比较方法。由于新增的地震地质资料不会改变原报告对地震地质研究的结论,近十多年地震的活动对工作区地震背景的影响没有发生根本变化。在分析研究本地区具有代表性的不同潜在震源区的划分方案后,采用相对应的地震动参数衰减关系进行地震危险性概率分析计算,与确定性方法计算结果比较后确定秦山核电二期扩建工程厂址极限安全地震动SL-2复核结果为0.15g。本次复核工作的技术路线可以为相似类型的重大工程地震参数复核参考。
|
| 关 键 词： | 核电厂 地震安全性评价 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-01-09 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年1月9日 |
Method of Multiple Plan Comparison in Seismic Safety Evaluation |
| |
| Liu Jianda and Huang Yonglin.Method of Multiple Plan Comparison in Seismic Safety Evaluation[J].Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,2006,1(1):47-55. |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Jianda and Huang Yonglin |
| |
| Institution: | Earthquake Engineering Institute of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, 210014;Earthquake Engineering Institute of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, 210014 |
| |
| Abstract: | A multiple schedules comparison method is applied for seismic safety evaluation in Qinshan Nuclear Power Plant construction in the second period. The previous conclusions on the seismo-geological and seismic activity in the report of seismic safety evaluation for Qinshan Nuclear Power Plant is confirmed by new data. The average depth of the earthquake occurred in recent 10 years is about 12.1km in the region, which is slightly different from 15km in whole China. The safety limit ground motion (SL-2) is 0.15g, which is resulted from several calculation plans and agrees with the existed result. The method presented in this paper may be applied for the seismic safety evaluation work of the similar engineer constructions. |
| |
| Keywords: | Nuclear Power Plant Seismic safety evaluation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《震灾防御技术》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《震灾防御技术》下载免费的PDF全文 |
