首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同脱气装置脱气效率对比分析
引用本文:夏伟奔,刘高川,王桂清,樊春燕.不同脱气装置脱气效率对比分析[J].地震地磁观测与研究,2013(5):229-233.
作者姓名:夏伟奔  刘高川  王桂清  樊春燕
作者单位:中国地震台网中心,中国北京100045
基金项目:中国地震台网中心青年基金资助——地下水中气体氡、汞的脱气—集气装置研究初探
摘    要:采用对比分析方法,用新设计的鼓泡式脱气装置与台站现普遍采用的溅散式脱气装置进行对比观测.在保持其他条件相同的情况下,经过实验对比,发现鼓泡式脱气装置具有更高的脱气效率,更适合小流量或者水温偏低的井(泉)的气体观测.

关 键 词:鼓泡式  溅散式  脱气装置  脱气效率

Preliminary study of the comparative analysis on the effucuebct of bubble-type and sputter-type degassing device
Xia Weiben,Liu Gaochuan,Wang Guiqing,Fan Chunyan.Preliminary study of the comparative analysis on the effucuebct of bubble-type and sputter-type degassing device[J].Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,2013(5):229-233.
Authors:Xia Weiben  Liu Gaochuan  Wang Guiqing  Fan Chunyan
Institution:1.China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing 100045, China;)
Abstract:We used the method of comparative analysis in this experiment,with a new design bubbletype degaassing device observed compare to the sputter type which existing stations commonly used.In the case of remain other conditions the same,through experiments contrast,we found that bubble-type degassing device has a higher efficiency,that is suitable for low flow or low temperature wells (spring) of the gas observations.
Keywords:bubble-type  sputter-type  degassing device  degassing efficiency
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号