Comparing the transitional behaviour of kaolinite and bentonite suspension flows |
| |
| Authors: | Jaco H Baas James L Best Jeff Peakall |
| |
| Institution: | 1. School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, UK;2. Departments of Geology, Geography and GIS, Mechanical Science and Engineering and Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA;3. School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK |
| |
| Abstract: | Past research has demonstrated the dramatic effects that variations in suspended clay can have on the properties of flow by producing a range of transitional flows between turbulent and laminar states, depending on clay concentration and fluid shear. Past studies have been restricted to kaolinite flows, a clay mineral that has relatively weak cohesive properties. This paper extends these studies to suspension flows of bentonite, a clay mineral that attains higher viscosities at far lower volumetric concentrations within a flow. The results show that the types of transitional flow behaviour recognized in past studies can also be found in bentonite suspension flows, but at lower suspended sediment concentrations, thus demonstrating an even more dramatic effect on flow properties, and potentially on sediment transport and resulting bed morphology, than kaolinite flows. The paper proposes new stability diagrams for the phase space of bentonite flows and compares these to past work on kaolinite suspension flows. These new data suggest that the transitional‐flow Reynolds number can be used to delineate the types of transitional flow across different clay types and assess modern and ancient clay‐suspension flows. © 2016 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
| |
| Keywords: | flume experiments transitional flow cohesion bentonite kaolinite |
|
|
