首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

双参微物理方案对一次强降水过程的数值试验
引用本文:单云鹏,银燕,肖辉.双参微物理方案对一次强降水过程的数值试验[J].气象科学,2014,34(1):1-9.
作者姓名:单云鹏  银燕  肖辉
作者单位:南京信息工程大学中国气象局气溶胶与云降水重点开放实验室, 南京 210044;南京信息工程大学中国气象局气溶胶与云降水重点开放实验室, 南京 210044;南京信息工程大学中国气象局气溶胶与云降水重点开放实验室, 南京 210044
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41030962);江苏省高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
摘    要:利用WRF模式,分别采用WDM6和Morrison双参微物理方案对2009年7月23—24日,华东地区的一次强降水过程进行数值模拟。通过对地面累积降水量、降水强度和云中微物理量分析,对比研究了以上两种双参微物理方案对降水的预报效果。结果显示两种方案都低估了强降水区域的降水强度,而且提早预报了降水发生的时间。但相比之下,Morrison方案更接近实际的观测结果,而WDM6方案的误差在50%以上。分析了云中微物理量场和参数化方案计算过程,发现由于WDM6方案对雨滴的定义不合理,在结果中存在大量小粒径的雨滴,使平均粒径远小于典型雨滴,导致雨水的下落过程中,蒸发作用的强度被高估,而沉降过程的强度被低估,因而低估地面降水。

关 键 词:强降水预报  微物理方案  WRF模式
收稿时间:1/2/2013 12:00:00 AM
修稿时间:2013/3/11 0:00:00

A sensitivity experiment of forecasting precipitation with double-moment microphysics schemes in WRF model
SHAN Yunpeng,YIN Yan and XIAO Hui.A sensitivity experiment of forecasting precipitation with double-moment microphysics schemes in WRF model[J].Scientia Meteorologica Sinica,2014,34(1):1-9.
Authors:SHAN Yunpeng  YIN Yan and XIAO Hui
Institution:Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Abstract:A heavy precipitation process in east China during July 23-24, 2009 is simulated to conduct a sensitivity experiment by WDM6 and Morrison schemes in WRF model. The accumulation precipitation, rain intensity and the microphysical cloud-parameters are analyzed in two simulations to assess the two microphysics schemes in precipitation prediction. Compared to the observation of the heavy rainfall, the underprediction of precipitation and the earlier rain starting are simulated by WRF model with both cloud microphysics schemes. However, the precipitation prediction with the Morrison scheme is more reasonable, while the WDM6 scheme produced a higher error above 50% compared to the observation. Due to the unreasonable definition of raindrop of WDM6 scheme, more raindrops whose size are smaller than the reasonable raindrop size distribution were modeled. Based on a calculation, it is found that the unreasonable definition of raindrops in WDM6 scheme might lead to an overestimation of evaporation and an underestimation of sedimentation for the raindrops, resulting in the underprediction of accumulated precipitation on the ground.
Keywords:Heavy precipitation forecast  Microphysics scheme  WRF model
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《气象科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《气象科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号