| 一次长江流域梅雨降水中三种云量计算方案的对比研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 崔文君,智协飞,朱寿鹏,周志敏,王晓芳,李红莉.一次长江流域梅雨降水中三种云量计算方案的对比研究[J].大气科学学报,2016,39(2):209-220. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 崔文君 智协飞 朱寿鹏 周志敏 王晓芳 李红莉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京信息工程大学 气象灾害教育部重点实验室/气候与环境变化国际合作联合实验室/气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心/东亚季风与区域气候变化科技创新团队, 江苏 南京 210044;美国北达科他大学 大气科学系, 北达科他州大福克斯市 58202;南京信息工程大学 气象灾害教育部重点实验室/气候与环境变化国际合作联合实验室/气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心/东亚季风与区域气候变化科技创新团队, 江苏 南京 210044;南京信息工程大学 气象灾害教育部重点实验室/气候与环境变化国际合作联合实验室/气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心/东亚季风与区域气候变化科技创新团队, 江苏 南京 210044;中国气象局 武汉暴雨研究所, 湖北 武汉 430205;中国气象局 武汉暴雨研究所, 湖北 武汉 430205;中国气象局 武汉暴雨研究所, 湖北 武汉 430205 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41575104);国家重大基础科学研究计划(2012CB955200)项目;江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD);江苏省"青蓝工程" |
| |
| 摘 要： | 采用NCEP分析场,选取2010年梅雨期长江流域的一次降水过程,分别基于Slingo方案、NCAR方案和钱氏方案,利用相对湿度计算云量,并以LAPS(Local Analysis and Prediction System)系统输出的云量分析场作为观测值,分别在高层(400 h Pa)与低层(850 h Pa),从宏观比较与统计分析的角度,与计算结果进行云量大小与区域分布的对比分析。结果表明,三个云量计算方案对云量中心位置的把握均较为准确,但对云量值的计算存在大小不等的误差。NCAR方案计算结果和LAPS输出场最为吻合,能够体现出云量大值区,但区域一般偏大;Slingo方案相较NCAR方案来说略差,但也能较好地描述云带分布;此外,钱氏方案计算出的云量值始终偏小,但其能够较好地描述云带轮廓与云量的分布特征。综合对比结果,NCAR云量计算方案比其余两者更优,且在低层(850 h Pa)表现尤为明显。
|
| 关 键 词： | 相对湿度 云量计算 Slingo方案 NCAR方案 钱氏方案 |
| 收稿时间： | 2015/11/2 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2016/3/10 0:00:00 |
Comparison of the performance of three schemes in calculating the cloudiness during a Mei-yu rainfall process over the Yangtze River Basin |
| |
| CUI Wenjun,ZHI Xiefei,ZHU Shoupeng,ZHOU Zhimin,WANG Xiaofang and LI Hongli.Comparison of the performance of three schemes in calculating the cloudiness during a Mei-yu rainfall process over the Yangtze River Basin[J].大气科学学报,2016,39(2):209-220. |
| |
| Authors: | CUI Wenjun ZHI Xiefei ZHU Shoupeng ZHOU Zhimin WANG Xiaofang and LI Hongli |
| |
| Institution: | Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disasters, Ministry of Education(KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change(ILCEC)/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters(CIC-FEMD)/Science and Technology Innovation Team of East Asian Monsoon and Regional Climate Change, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Department of Atmospheric Science, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA;Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disasters, Ministry of Education(KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change(ILCEC)/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters(CIC-FEMD)/Science and Technology Innovation Team of East Asian Monsoon and Regional Climate Change, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disasters, Ministry of Education(KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change(ILCEC)/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters(CIC-FEMD)/Science and Technology Innovation Team of East Asian Monsoon and Regional Climate Change, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Wuhan Institute of Heavy Rain, CMA, Wuhan 430205, China;Wuhan Institute of Heavy Rain, CMA, Wuhan 430205, China;Wuhan Institute of Heavy Rain, CMA, Wuhan 430205, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Cloud is an important internal factor of the climate system,especially in the earth-atmosphere system.The formation of clouds and their characteristics mainly result from both dynamic and thermodynamic processes of the surface and the atmosphere.An accurate grasp of the distribution of cloud and its variability can contribute greatly when attempting to assess the role of cloud in climate change.And related to this,a calculation scheme that is effective at describing cloudiness is a key part of improving the ability to simulate cloud in numerical models.In order to identify a satisfactory cloudiness calculation scheme,the present study employed NCEP reanalysis data to calculate cloudiness and relative humidity,based on three schemes(Slingo,NCAR,and Qian),during a Mei-yu rainfall process in the Yangtze River basin in 2010.Comparative analysis between the calculation results and Local Analysis and Prediction System(LAPS) reanalysis data,considered as the cloud observation,was conducted in terms of cloud distribution and cloudiness values at upper and lower levels,represented by 400 hPa and 850 hPa,respectively.Based on the comparison results,as well as statistical analysis involving anomaly correlation coefficients(ACCs) and RMSE,it was found that the three cloudiness calculation schemes all managed to successfully simulate the cloud central positions,but each had their own advantages and particular characteristics when it came to cloudiness values.The results calculated using the NCAR scheme matched the LAPS outputs very well at large-value centers of cloud,but the regions containing these values were always too large.To a certain extent,although it was found that the Slingo scheme could also describe the cloud well,it showed a slightly lower capacity than the NCAR scheme in terms of its cloudiness calculation.Additionally,the Qian scheme demonstrated fairly limited ability to calculate the cloudiness values,but always presented the cloud profile and its distribution accurately.Based on the statistical analysis,at 850 hPa,the NCAR scheme produced its maximum ACC and minimum RMSE,indicating its superiority over the other schemes at calculating the cloudiness at that height.However,the Qian scheme yielded the best statistical results at 400 hPa,possibly due to the close correspondence of its cloudiness distribution results with the observation.Of importance here is that,to a certain extent,the Qian scheme takes into account the cloud formation mechanism and the influence of atmospheric vertical motion on cloud formation when calculating the cloudiness.Overall,based on this comprehensive comparison of relevant factors,we conclude that the NCAR scheme is superior to the others,particularly at the lower level(850 hPa). |
| |
| Keywords: | relative humidity cloudiness calculation Slingo scheme NCAR scheme Qian scheme |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《大气科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《大气科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
