首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

山东近岸海域表层沉积物7种重金属污染特征和生态风险评估研究
引用本文:徐艳东,魏潇,杨建敏,唐海田,吴兴伟,马建新.山东近岸海域表层沉积物7种重金属污染特征和生态风险评估研究[J].海洋与湖沼,2015,46(3):651-658.
作者姓名:徐艳东  魏潇  杨建敏  唐海田  吴兴伟  马建新
作者单位:山东省海洋资源与环境研究院 山东省海洋生态修复重点实验室 烟台 264006;中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院 青岛 266100,山东省海洋资源与环境研究院 山东省海洋生态修复重点实验室 烟台 264006,山东省海洋资源与环境研究院 山东省海洋生态修复重点实验室 烟台 264006,国家海洋局烟台海洋环境监测中心站 烟台 264006,山东省海洋资源与环境研究院 山东省海洋生态修复重点实验室 烟台 264006,山东省海洋资源与环境研究院 山东省海洋生态修复重点实验室 烟台 264006
基金项目:国家海洋公益性行业专项经费项目, 201105006 号, 201205001 号; 烟台市科学技术发展计划项目, 2008160 号; 黄河三角洲学者——海洋生物遗传育种岗位。
摘    要:本文综合运用单因子污染指数法、Hakanson潜在生态风险指数法和沉积物质量基准法3种方法,研究和评价了2012年和2013年山东近岸海域表层沉积物重金属的污染特征和潜在生态风险。结果表明:山东近岸海域94%以上站位的表层沉积物重金属含量符合第一类海洋沉积物质量标准,沉积物质量良好;山东近岸海域重金属综合潜在生态风险低,各重金属潜在生态风险由高到低为HgAsCdPbCuCrZn(2012年)和HgCdAsPbCuCrZn(2013年),Hg在个别站位达中潜在生态风险程度,为主要污染因子;50%以上站位As含量介于美国佛罗里达州和加拿大沉积物质量基准的TEL—PEL之间,表明负面生物效应偶尔发生。应加强对山东近岸海域表层沉积物中重金属Hg和As的监测,重点关注二者相对高值区的潜在生态风险和负面生物效应。

关 键 词:重金属  沉积物  生态风险评估  山东近岸海域
收稿时间:2014/11/6 0:00:00
修稿时间:2014/12/25 0:00:00

CONTAMINANT CHARACTERISTICS AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT ON POLLUTION BY SEVEN HEAVY METALS IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS IN SHANDONG COASTAL AREAS
XU Yan-Dong,WEI Xiao,YANG Jian-Min,TANG Hai-Tian,WU Xing-Wei and MA Jian-Xin.CONTAMINANT CHARACTERISTICS AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT ON POLLUTION BY SEVEN HEAVY METALS IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS IN SHANDONG COASTAL AREAS[J].Oceanologia Et Limnologia Sinica,2015,46(3):651-658.
Authors:XU Yan-Dong  WEI Xiao  YANG Jian-Min  TANG Hai-Tian  WU Xing-Wei and MA Jian-Xin
Institution:Shandong Marine Resource and Environment Research Institute, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Restoration for Marine Ecology, Yantai, 264006;College of Environment Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100,Shandong Marine Resource and Environment Research Institute, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Restoration for Marine Ecology, Yantai, 264006,Shandong Marine Resource and Environment Research Institute, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Restoration for Marine Ecology, Yantai, 264006,Yantai Marine Environment Monitoring Central Station, State Oceanic Administration, Yantai 264006, China,Shandong Marine Resource and Environment Research Institute, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Restoration for Marine Ecology, Yantai, 264006 and Shandong Marine Resource and Environment Research Institute, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Restoration for Marine Ecology, Yantai, 264006
Abstract:With field observation data of heavy metal pollution in surface sediments in Shandong coastal areas in 2012 and 2013, we assessed the ecological risk in these areas by adopting three different indices, i.e., single factor index (SFI), Hakanson's potential ecological risk index (PERI), and sediment quality guidelines (SQG). The results show that among 38 monitoring stations, 94% of them were in rather good status whose heavy metal contents in surface sediments comply with the national first-class benchmark in marine sediment quality. The heavy metals were at the low level of comprehensive potential ecological risk, in descending order of Hg>As>Cd>Pb>Cu>Cr>Zn (in 2012) and Hg>Cd>As>Pb>Cu>Cr>Zn (in 2013). Mercury was determined as the principal pollution factor, as its potential ecological risk was moderate in few stations; arsenic contents were between the TEL (threshold effect level) and PEL (probable effect level) in American (Florida) and Canadian guidelines in over half of the stations, showing occasional adverse biological effects. Therefore, close watchout and stringent control shall be taken to prevent mercury and arsenic pollutions, and special attentions shall be paid to potential ecological risk and adverse biological effects in the coastal areas to lower relatively high values.
Keywords:heavy metals  sediments  ecological risk assessment  Shandong coastal areas
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《海洋与湖沼》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《海洋与湖沼》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号