Moving beyond the MSY concept to reflect multidimensional fisheries management objectives |
| |
| Institution: | 1. DTU Aqua National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kemitorvet 1, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark;2. Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, United Kingdom;3. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, H.C.Andersens Boulevard 44-46, 1553 Copenhagen V, Denmark;4. Azti, Txatxarramendi Ugartea z/g, 48395 Sukarrieta, Spain;5. Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystem Studies (IMARES), Wageningen University & Research Centre (WUR), P.O. Box 68, 1970 AB IJmuiden, The Netherlands;6. Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Palmaille 9, 22761 Hamburg, Germany;7. Ministry for Primary Industries, PO Box 2526, Wellington, New Zealand;8. Scottish Pelagic Fishermen''s Organisation, Heritage House, 135-139 Shore Street, Fraserburgh, Aberdeenshire AB43 9BP, United Kingdom;10. Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centre Oceanogràfic de les Balears, Moll de Ponent, s/n, 07015 Palma de Mallorca, Spain;11. Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, PO Box 2214, 71003 Heraklion, Crete, Greece;12. Department of Economics, University of Kiel, Wilhelm-Seelig-Platz 1, 24118 Kiel, Germany;13. Irish Marine Institute, Galway, Ireland;1. Univ Brest, Ifremer, CNRS, UMR 6308, AMURE, IUEM, 29280 Plouzané, France;2. Ifremer, Univ Brest, CNRS, UMR 6308, AMURE, Unité d''Economie Maritime, IUEM, F-29280 Plouzané, France;1. Faculty of Business Administration, University of Akureyri, Iceland;2. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Iceland, Iceland;3. Faculty of Business Administration, University of Iceland, Iceland;1. ITAM, Centro de Investigación Económica, Av. Camino Santa Teresa 930, Col. Hroes de Padierna, Del. Magdalena Contreras, C.P. 10700 México, D.F., Mexico;2. U.Vigo, Escuela de Comercio, Calle Torrecedeira 105, 36208 Vigo, Spain;3. AZTI, Txatxarramendi ugartea z/g, 48395 Sukarrieta, Bizkaia, Spain;4. El Colegio de México, Camino al Ajusco No. 20, Col. Pedregal de Sta. Teresa, C.P. 10740 México, D.F., Mexico;5. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas (IIM) CSIC, C/ Eduardo Cabello, 6, 36208 Vigo, Spain;1. Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia;2. Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Australia;1. Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand;2. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA), New Zealand;3. School of Environment, University of Auckland, New Zealand |
| |
| Abstract: | Maximising the long term average catch of single stock fisheries as prescribed by the globally-legislated MSY objective is unlikely to ensure ecosystem, economic, social and governance sustainability unless an effort is made to explicitly include these considerations. We investigated how objectives to be maximised can be combined with sustainability constraints aiming specifically at one or more of these four sustainability pillars. The study was conducted as a three-year interactive process involving 290 participating science, industry, NGO and management representatives from six different European regions. Economic considerations and inclusive governance were generally preferred as the key objectives to be maximised in complex fisheries, recognising that ecosystem, social and governance constraints are also key aspects of sustainability in all regions. Relative preferences differed between regions and cases but were similar across a series of workshops, different levels of information provided and the form of elicitation methods used as long as major shifts in context or stakeholder composition did not occur. Maximising inclusiveness in governance, particularly the inclusiveness of affected stakeholders, was highly preferred by participants across the project. This suggests that advice incorporating flexibility in the interpretation of objectives to leave room for meaningful inclusiveness in decision-making processes is likely to be a prerequisite for stakeholder buy-in to management decisions. |
| |
| Keywords: | Sustainability pillars Inclusive governance MSY MEY MSOY Management objectives |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
