Diatom feeding across trophic guilds in tidal flat nematodes,and the importance of diatom cell size |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Ghent University, Biology Department, Marine Biology Lab, Krijgslaan 281/S8, 9000 Gent, Belgium;2. Ghent University, Biology Department, Laboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Krijgslaan 281/S8, 9000 Gent, Belgium;3. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Biology, Department of Zoology, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;1. Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, UMR BOREA “Biologie des ORganismes et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques” (MNHN, UPMC, UCBN, CNRS-7208, IRD-207), Caen, France;2. Université de Lille1, UMR CNRS 8187 LOG “Laboratoire d''Océanologie et Géosciences”, Station Marine de Wimereux, Wimereux, France;1. Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, UMR BOREA (MNHN, UPMC, UCBN, CNRS-7208, IRD-207), Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen, France;2. UMR 7266 CNRS - Laboratoire LIENSs, Université de La Rochelle, 2 rue Olympe de Gouges, 17000 La Rochelle Cedex, France;3. CNRS, FRE3350, LECOB, Observatoire Océanologique, 66651 Banyuls/mer, France;4. Université de Lille1 Sciences et Technologies, CNRS, UMR 8187 LOG «Laboratoire d''Océanologie et de Géosciences», Station Marine de Wimereux, 28 av. Foch, 62930 Wimereux, France;5. Laboratoire Microorganismes, Génome et Environnement, UMR 6023 CNRS-Université de Clermont-Ferrand II, 24 avenue des Landais, 63177 Aubière Cedex, France;1. Departamento de Biologia and CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal;2. Centro de Ciências do Mar e Ambiente (MARE), Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal |
| |
| Abstract: | We examine the capacity of nematodes from three feeding types (deposit feeder, epistrate feeder, predator) to utilize microphytobenthos (MPB), and assess whether diatom cell size and consumer body size are important drivers of their feeding. We analyzed natural stable isotope ratios of carbon and nitrogen in abundant nematode genera and a variety of carbon sources at an estuarine intertidal flat. All nematodes had δ13C indicating that MPB is their major carbon source. δ15N, however, demonstrated that only one deposit and one epistrate feeder genus obtained most of their carbon from direct grazing on MPB, whereas other deposit feeders and predators obtained at least part of their carbon by predation on MPB grazers. We then performed a microcosm experiment in which equal cell numbers of each of three differently sized strains of the pennate diatom Seminavis were offered as food to four, one and one genera of deposit feeders, epistrate feeders and predators, respectively. Previous studies have shown that all but the epistrate feeder ingest whole diatoms, whereas the epistrate feeder pierces cells and sucks out their contents. Most genera showed markedly higher carbon absorption from medium and large cells than from small ones. When considering the number of cells consumed, however, none of the nematodes which ingest whole cells exhibited a clear preference for any specific diatom size. The epistrate feeder was the smallest nematode taxon considered here, yet it showed a marked preference for large cells. These results highlight that the feeding mechanism is much more important than consumer size as a driver of particle size selection in nematodes grazing MPB. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
