| 海岸带区域海洋生态环境承载力综合评价方法体系的探讨与分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴侃侃,姜尚,高宇,吴海燕,黄海萍,陈克亮.海岸带区域海洋生态环境承载力综合评价方法体系的探讨与分析[J].海洋开发与管理,2023,40(11):46-58. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴侃侃 姜尚 高宇 吴海燕 黄海萍 陈克亮 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 自然资源部第三海洋研究所； 自然资源部海洋生态保护与修复重点实验室； 福建省海洋生态保护与修复重点实验室;自然资源部第三海洋研究所； 自然资源部海洋生态保护与修复重点实验室；厦门海洋职业技术学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目“热带流域-河口典型生态系统演化及其对自然变异和人类活动的响应”（41961144022）；自然资源部第三海洋研究所基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“孟加拉卡纳普里河流域-河口污染物输移特征及综合管理研究”（海三科202008）；三亚市重点海域污染物排海总量控制制度试点项目（S200929）. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 作为协调海岸带区域开发利用活动与生态环境保护之间关系，衡量海岸带区域可持续发展能力的重要手段之一，海洋生态环境承载力综合评价的量化研究至关重要。文章总结了当前海洋生态环境承载力综合评价研究中所存在的问题，比较分析了当前承载力评价中常用的技术方法，并结合海岸带区域的特点，遴选出一套适用于海岸带区域海洋生态环境承载力综合评价的方法体系；在此基础上，通过案例应用的结果分析，进一步探讨该方法体系的可行性与局限性，并提出了改进建议。研究结果表明：鉴于海岸带区域生态系统的复杂性和不确定性，目前一些传统、常用的承载力评价方法，并不能很好地适用于海岸带区域海洋生态环境承载力综合评价；文章所提出的方法体系通过充分考虑人类活动与海洋生态环境之间的相互作用，能较好地支持海岸带区域海洋生态环境承载力评价指标体系的建立，客观地对各项评价指标进行赋权，并能定量化地对海洋生态环境承载力开展综合分析与评估，从而为海岸带区域生态环境承载力综合评价提供一个可行的途径，并为确保海岸带区域的可持续发展提供经验参考；此外，该方法体系存在着两方面的局限性，包括缺乏权威和统一的指标体系构建方法，以及缺乏具体的评价结果分级标准。鉴此，建议未来需要对指标体系构建和评价结果分类标准的相关方法，进一步开展深入研究，从而不断地完善海洋生态环境承载力综合评价的方法体系，使海洋生态环境承载力综合评价的结果更加科学精确。
|
| 关 键 词： | 海洋生态环境承载力 评价方法 比较分析 局限性与建议 |
| 收稿时间： | 2023/3/24 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2023/10/26 0:00:00 |
The Discussions and Analysis on Methods for the Integrated Assessment of Marine Eco environmental Carrying Capacity in Coastal Areas |
| |
| WU Kankan,JIANG Shang,GAO Yu,WU Haiyan,HUANG Haiping,CHEN Keliang.The Discussions and Analysis on Methods for the Integrated Assessment of Marine Eco environmental Carrying Capacity in Coastal Areas[J].Ocean Development and Management,2023,40(11):46-58. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Kankan JIANG Shang GAO Yu WU Haiyan HUANG Haiping CHEN Keliang |
| |
| Institution: | Third Institute of Oceanography, MNR;Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Conservation and Restoration, MNR;Fujian Province Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Conservation and Restoration; Third Institute of Oceanography, MNR;Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Conservation and Restoration, MNR;Xiamen Ocean Vocational College |
| |
| Abstract: | As one of the important means to coordinate the relationship between the development and utilization activities of the coastal zone and the protection of the ecological environment, and to measure the sustainable development capacity of the coastal zone, the quantitative research of the comprehensive evaluation of marine eco-environment carrying capacity (MECC) of the is very important. This study reviews the existing problems in the current integrated assessment of MECC, compares and analyzes the commonly used methods for carrying capacity assessment, and selects a set of potential methods that is suitable for the integrated assessment of MECC in coastal areas according to the characteristics of coastal areas. On this basis, through the analysis of the results of the case application, the practicability and limitations of this set of methods is further discussed, and several improvement suggestions are proposed. The results show that: (1) in view of the complexity and uncertainty of the coastal ecosystem, some traditional and commonly used assessment methods of carrying capacity cannot be well applied to the integrated assessment of MECC in coastal areas; (2) by fully considering the interaction between human activities and the marine eco-environment, this set of potential methods proposed in this study can better support the establishment of the assessment index system, objectively give weight to each assessment index, and quantitatively analyze and evaluate the comprehensive MECC. And thus, it can provide a feasible approach for the integrated assessment of MECC as well as empirical references for ensuring a sustainable coastal development; (3) additionally, it still has several limitations, such as, mainly, the lack of authoritative and unified indicator systems, as well as specific rating standards. Therefore, future studies should focus on related methods for the establishment of assessment indicator system and the classification criteria for evaluation results, so as to improve the assessment system for MECC and thus apply it to a more scientific analysis of the MECC in coastal areas. |
| |
| Keywords: | Marine eco-environmental carrying capacity Assessment methods Comparison and analysis Limitations and suggestions |
|
| 点击此处可从《海洋开发与管理》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《海洋开发与管理》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
