首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

资源再生型地区资源环境承载能力评价指标体系构建——以河南省洛宁县为例
作者姓名:李稳  宫少军  梁昊  王国槐  王培培
作者单位:1.天津市地质研究和海洋地质中心,天津 300170; 2.天津华勘自然资源勘测技术开发有限公司, 天津 300170; 3.中国冶金地质总局中南地质调查院,湖北 武汉 430083
基金项目:中国地质环境监测院“秦岭资源型典型地区资源环境承载能力评价试点(编号: DD2017065)”、天津市规划和自然资源局“基于陆海统筹的海岸带‘双评价’研究(编号: ML2019-HP-F162)”和天津华北地质勘查局“宝坻区资源环境承载能力评价研究(编号: HK2018-B4-5)”项目联合资助
摘    要:为构建资源再生型地区资源环境承载能力评价指标体系,以河南省洛宁县为例,通过开展1:5万环境地质调查与地质环境背景资料收集,查明了该区资源环境禀赋条件和短板要素,并在地质环境承载能力、地下水资源承载能力和矿产资源承载能力评价的基础上,引入了矿山地质环境承载能力评价,创新性地构建了一套适用于资源再生型地区的资源环境承载能力评价指标体系。在完成实际验证评价的基础上,与通用资源环境承载能力评价指标体系进行了对比分析,结果发现,矿山地质环境承载能力评价结果与地质环境承载能力评价结果并不完全一致,且与矿产资源承载能力评价结果也有一定差异。研究表明,构建的资源再生型地区资源环境承载能力评价指标体系更适宜此类地区矿区分散分布且发展方式迥异的特点,能进一步突出地域主导特色,可为同类地区地质环境保护及资源开发规划提供参考。

关 键 词:资源再生型地区  承载能力  指标体系  矿山地质环境  
收稿时间:2020-08-31

Establishment of the evaluation index system for resources and environment carrying capacity in resource regeneration areas: A case study of Luoning County,Henan Province
Authors:LI Wen  GONG Shaojun  LIANG Hao  WANG Guohuai  WANG Peipei
Institution:1. Tianjin Geological Research and Marine Geology Center, Tianjin 300170, China; 2. Tianjin Huakan Natural Resources Exploration Technology Development Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300170, China; 3. Central South Geological Survey Institute of China Metallurgical Geology Bureau, Hubei Wuhan 430083, China
Abstract:In order to establish the evaluation index system of resources and environment carrying capacity in resource regeneration areas, the authors in this paper have carried out 1:50 000 environmental geological survey and geological environment background data collection in Luoning County of Henan Province, in order to find out the resources and environment endowment conditions and its disadvantageous elements. Based on the evaluation of geological environment, groundwater and mineral resources carrying capacity, the authors have adopted the evaluation of mine geo-environment carrying capacity to creatively construct a set of evaluation index system of resources and environment carrying capacity suitable for resource regeneration areas. On the basis of the actual verification and evaluation, through the comparison with the general evaluation index system of resources and environment carrying capacity, the authors have concluded that the mine geo-environment carrying capacity result is different from the geological environment carrying capacity result, and is also different from the mineral resource carrying capacity result. The results above show that the carrying capacity evaluation system in this paper is more suitable for resource regeneration areas with scattered mining areas and different development modes, which could further highlight the regional leading characteristics and provide some reference for geological environment protection and resource development planning in similar areas.
Keywords:resource regeneration areas  carrying capacity  index system  mine geo-environment  
点击此处可从《》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号