|
|||||
|
|
Palaeoclimate estimates for the Middle Miocene Schrotzburg flora (S Germany): a multi-method approach |
|
| Authors: | Dieter Uhl Angela A Bruch Christopher Traiser Stefan Klotz |
| Institution: | 1. Institut für Geowissenschaften, Eberhard Karls Universit?t Tübingen, Sigwartstr. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany 2. Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Department of Palaeoecology, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD, Utrecht, The Netherlands 3. Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt, Germany 4. Laboratoire PaléoEnvironnements et PaléobioSphère (UMR 5125), Université Cl.Bernard-Lyon 1, 27-43 boulevard du 11 Novembre, 69622, Villeurbanne Cedex, France |
| Abstract: | We present a detailed palaeoclimate analysis of the Middle Miocene (uppermost Badenian–lowermost Sarmatian) Schrotzburg locality in S Germany, based on the fossil macro- and micro-flora, using four different methods for the estimation of palaeoclimate parameters: the coexistence approach (CA), leaf margin analysis (LMA), the Climate-Leaf Analysis Multivariate Program (CLAMP), as well as a recently developed multivariate leaf physiognomic approach based on an European calibration dataset (ELPA). Considering results of all methods used, the following palaeoclimate estimates seem to be most likely: mean annual temperature ∼15–16°C (MAT), coldest month mean temperature ∼7°C (CMMT), warmest month mean temperature between 25 and 26°C, and mean annual precipiation ∼1,300 mm, although CMMT values may have been colder as indicated by the disappearance of the crocodile Diplocynodon and the temperature thresholds derived from modern alligators. For most palaeoclimatic parameters, estimates derived by CLAMP significantly differ from those derived by most other methods. With respect to the consistency of the results obtained by CA, LMA and ELPA, it is suggested that for the Schrotzburg locality CLAMP is probably less reliable than most other methods. A possible explanation may be attributed to the correlation between leaf physiognomy and climate as represented by the CLAMP calibration data set which is largely based on extant floras from N America and E Asia and which may be not suitable for application to the European Neogene. All physiognomic methods used here were affected by taphonomic biasses. Especially the number of taxa had a great influence on the reliability of the palaeoclimate estimates. Both multivariate leaf physiognomic approaches are less influenced by such biasses than the univariate LMA. In combination with previously published results from the European and Asian Neogene, our data suggest that during the Neogene in Eurasia CLAMP may produce temperature estimates, which are systematically too cold as compared to other evidence. This pattern, however, has to be further investigated using additional palaeofloras.Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Harald Walther, Dresden, on the occasion of his 75th birthday. |
| Keywords: | Neogene Palaeoclimate Taphonomy Leaf physiognomy Nearest living relatives |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ | |