|
|||||
|
|
Mineral inclusions in microdiamonds and macrodiamonds from kimberlites of Yakutia: a comparative study |
|
| Authors: | NV Sobolev AM Logvinova DA Zedgenizov YV Seryotkin ES Yefimova C Floss LA Taylor |
| Institution: | a Institute of Mineralogy and Petrography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch 630090, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation b Laboratory for Space Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA c Planetary Geosciences Institute, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA |
| Abstract: | Chemical compositions were determined on mineral inclusions recovered from 290 microdiamonds (<1 mm) from 8 operating diamond mines in Yakutia. The sampled diamond mines include Mir, Udachnaya, Internatsionalnaya, Aykhal, Sytykanskaya, Yubileynaya, Komsomolskaya and Krasnopresnenskaya. The mineral inclusions include both ultramafic (peridotitic) suite (U-type) and eclogitic suite (E-type) examples. Olivines, chromites, Cr-pyropes, Cr-diopsides and enstatite were studied from U-type diamonds. Mg–Ca–Fe-garnets and omphacitic clinopyroxenes were studied from E-type microdiamonds. Abundances and compositions of these inclusions were compared with published and unpublished data on inclusions available from approximately 2000 macrodiamonds (>1 mm) from the same sources, and worldwide data for olivines and chromites. Although there are general similarities, notable exceptions were detected in about 10% of the inclusions from microdiamonds. For each of the pipes, anomalous compositions occur between the micro- and macrodiamond inclusions, but in different proportions, sometimes as high as 50% of the inclusions. Our study has demonstrated that mineral inclusions in microdiamonds are considerably more variable in their compositions and parageneses compared with inclusions in macrodiamonds. Significant compositional anomalies in inclusions from microdiamonds include: (1) garnets containing pyroxene solid solution (majoritic component) both in U- and E-type microdiamonds from three pipes: Yubileynaya, Komsomolskaya and Krasnopresnenskaya. The moles of Si (pfu) in these garnets range from 3.07 to 3.13 and as high as 3.29, on the basis of 12 oxygens, along with a notable contents of Na2O in two eclogitic garnets (0.43 and 0.93 wt.%) and uniquely high Cr2O3 and CaO contents in an ultramafic garnet of wehrlitic paragenesis; (2) coexisting wehrlitic garnets in a single microdiamond, one majoritic, the other normal, both with distinct +Eu anomalies, considered as signatures of crustal protoliths for the precursors to these garnets; (3) olivines with relatively low Fo (86–89) and high-NiO contents (0.46–0.64 wt.%), from Yubileynaya and Sytykanskaya microdiamonds; (4) chromites containing high-TiO2 (up to 4.7 wt.%) and some extremely rich in MgO (Mg# 80). It is concluded that many of these compositional features observed may be related to a deeper origin for the microdiamond source region (>300 km), for at least a 10–30% portion of microdiamonds from each Yakutian pipe. |
| Keywords: | Diamond Inclusions Siberian craton Yakutia Eclogite Peridotite Kimberlite |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ | |