| 早古生代阿拉善地块与华北地块之间的关系:来自阿拉善东缘中奥陶统碎屑锆石的信息 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张进,李锦轶,刘建峰,李岩峰,曲军峰,冯乾文.早古生代阿拉善地块与华北地块之间的关系:来自阿拉善东缘中奥陶统碎屑锆石的信息[J].岩石学报,2012,28(9):2912-2934. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张进 李锦轶 刘建峰 李岩峰 曲军峰 冯乾文 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国地质科学院地质研究所,北京,100037
2. 中国地震搜救中心,北京,100049 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文受国家重点基础研究发展计划(2007CB411306); 国家自然科学基金(41172198、40702032)和中国地质调查局项目(1212010611806、1212010611817)联合资助 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 阿拉善东缘奥陶纪地层位于鄂尔多斯(华北地块)与北祁连早古生代造山带之间的过渡地区,该区的构造背景一直是长期争论的问题,它涉及到阿拉善地块是否与华北地块相连、奥陶系的物源以及"贺兰拗拉槽"是否存在等问题。分布于阿拉善地块东缘的中奥陶统米钵山组的碎屑锆石LA-ICP-MSU-Pb年龄测试表明,样品中数量最多的锆石年龄为900～950Ma,Alxa-1的峰值年龄为916Ma,Alxa-2的峰值年龄为953Ma,次者在494～623Ma之间,这个区间内存在多个峰值,如Alxa-1存在505Ma和588Ma两个主要峰值,Alxa-2则存在494Ma、517Ma、623Ma等几个峰值。在2.5Ga左右两个样品都存在一个弱的峰值,Alxa-1峰值为2517Ma,而Alxa-2峰值为2552Ma和2670Ma。除此之外,两个样品都有个别大于3.0Ga的成分,Alxa-1样品中最年轻的锆石为451±8Ma,Alxa-2样品则为483±4Ma。这些年龄以及沉积特征表明:(1)传统认为的奥陶纪"贺兰拗拉槽"并不存在,鄂尔多斯西南缘地区以及阿拉善东部地区当时属于北祁连早古生代周缘前陆盆地系统;(2)早古生代主要物源来自北祁连造山带,新元古代物源来自阿拉善地块;(3)鄂尔多斯西缘整个米钵山组的锆石年龄分布及其变化,指示出北祁连造山带(岛弧)逐渐靠近阿拉善地块,其间洋盆逐渐消失的过程;(4)阿拉善地块基底与华北有明显差别,阿拉善地块明显受到新元古代和古生代构造热事件的影响,两者可能是在中奥陶世或之后才拼贴在一起。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中奥陶世 阿拉善地块 碎屑锆石 米钵山组 贺兰拗拉槽 |
| 收稿时间： | 9/5/2011 12:00:00 AM |
| 修稿时间： | 2011/12/2 0:00:00 |
The relationship between the Alxa Block and the North China Plate during the Early Paleozoic: New information from the Middle Ordovician detrial zircon ages in the eastern Alxa Block |
| |
| ZHANG Jin,LI JinYi,LIU JianFeng,LI YanFeng,QU JunFeng and FENG QianWen.The relationship between the Alxa Block and the North China Plate during the Early Paleozoic: New information from the Middle Ordovician detrial zircon ages in the eastern Alxa Block[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2012,28(9):2912-2934. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Jin LI JinYi LIU JianFeng LI YanFeng QU JunFeng and FENG QianWen |
| |
| Institution: | Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China;Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China;Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China;China Center for Earthquake Disaster Emergency, Beijing 100049, China;Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China;Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Located between the North China Plate to the east, and the North Qilian Orogenic Belt to the southeast, the eastern Alxa Block is the key region to answer many controversies surrounding the tectonic setting of this region in the Early Paleozoic; among them the debates on the basement composition of the Alxa Block, whether the Alxa Block connected to the North China Plate in the Early Paleozoic, when exactly this event did happen, where the Lower Paleozoic sedimentary rocks along the southwestern Ordos had their provenances, and whether the so-called Helan Aulacogen formed in the Ordovician are the key questions to be solved. Laser-ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy U-Pb dating of detrital zircons in two samples from Middle Ordovician sandstones to the west of Helan Shan located in the eastern Alxa Block yields a majority of 206Pb/238U ages between 900Ma and 950Ma with peak ages at 916Ma in Sample Alxa-1 and 953Ma in Sample Alxa-2, respectively, a smaller group yields 206Pb/238U ages between 494Ma and 623Ma with peak ages at 505Ma and 588Ma in Sample Alxa-1 and 494Ma, 517Ma and 623Ma in Sample Alxa-2, respectively. Two samples all have a minor peak age at ca. 2500Ma with 2517Ma in Alxa-1 and 2552Ma and 2670Ma in Alxa-2. Moreover, there are a few zircons older than 3000Ma. The youngest 206Pb/238U ages of the two samples are similar with 451±8Ma in Alxa-1 and 483±4Ma in Alxa-2. These zircon U-Pb ages combined with several lines of sedimentary evidence imply that the so-called Helan Aulacogen did not exist in the Ordovician; a peripheral foreland basin related to the North Qilian Orogenic Belt developed instead, the Early Paleozoic detritals mainly came from the North Qilian Arc, the Neoproterozoic detritals mainly came from the Alxa Block, the detrital zircon ages along the whole western Ordos showing that the North Qilian Orogenic Belt (Arc) came closer to the Alxa Block, and the ocean between them closed gradually, and the basement of the Alxa Block is different from that of North China Plate, the Alxa Block underwent important tectono-magmatic events during the Paleozoic and Neoproterozoic, which have not found in the North China Plate. The Alxa Block may connect with the North China Plate during the Middle Ordovician or after it. |
| |
| Keywords: | Middle Ordovician Alxa Block detrital zircon Miboshan Formation Helan Aulacogen |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《岩石学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《岩石学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
