首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中美县级土地整治政策对比研究
引用本文:李乐,丁伟强,林伟,王立华,董江玉,徐倩,张艳秀,张窻.中美县级土地整治政策对比研究[J].山东地质,2014(5):85-89.
作者姓名:李乐  丁伟强  林伟  王立华  董江玉  徐倩  张艳秀  张窻
作者单位:[1]东营市土地综合整治服务中心,山东东营257091 [2]山东省物化探勘察院,山东济南250013 [3]青岛市勘察测绘研究院,山东青岛266032 [4]东营市国土资源局,山东东营257091
摘    要:通过对比分析美国洛杉矶县住房供应规划中空闲地和低效利用地整治与我国县级城乡建设用地增减挂钩规划中农村空闲地和低效利用地整治在目的、空闲地和低效利用地确定、公共参与、与总体规划关系方面的差异,分析了我国目前县级城乡建设用地增减挂钩规划存在的不足,并进行了讨论。

关 键 词:土地整治  城乡建设用地  增减挂钩规划  空闲地  低效利用地

Comparison of County Level Land Consolidation Policies between China and America
Institution:LI Le, DING Weiqiang, LIN Wei, WANG Lihua, DONG Jiangyu, XU Qian, ZHANG Yanxiu, ZHANG Fang (1. Dongying Land Consolidation Service Center, Shandong Dongying 257091, China; 2. Shandong Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration Institute, Shandong Jinan 250013, China; 3. Qingdao Geotechnical Investigation and Surveying Institute, Shandong Qingdao 266032, China; 4. Dongying Bureau of Land and Resources, Shandong Dongying 257091, China)
Abstract:In this paper,county level land consolidation policies between China and America have been compared, such as consolidation goals,the determination of vacant and under utilized land,public participation,and the rela-tionship between land consolidation specific plan and general plan.And further discussion has been carried out a-bout the shortcomings in increasing urban construction land and decreasing rural construction land.It will provide some references for the optimization of Chinese land use administration.
Keywords:Land consolidation  decreasing urban construction land and increasing rural construction land  vacant land  underutilized land
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号