首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Introduction to pareto optimal mine planning
Authors:Paul B Appiah  Michael A Rosenman  John R Sturgul
Institution:(1) School of Mines, University of New South Wales, P.O.B. 1, 2033 Kensington, New South Wales, Australia;(2) Dept. of Architectural Science, University of Sydney, Australia;(3) Gartrell School of Mines, South Australian Institute of Technology, P.O.B. 1, Ingle Farm, Australia
Abstract:Summary Recent advances in mathematical optimization have resulted in the development of superior techniques for solving realistic decision making problems. The technique called PARETO OPTIMAL SERIAL DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING is presented here as a tool for rational mine planning. This approach always enables the identification of a set of decision alternatives considered superior to the remaining feasible, usually numerous, decision alternatives, when a number of conflicting, noncommensurable, objectives are simultaneously optimized. It is further noted that the decision makers' truly preferred decision is always one of the members identified as the superior set.Notation A] Number of initial decision alternatives for production stage 1 - A eegr] Accumulated pareto optimal stage objective vector at stage eegr for the remainder of the stagesNeegr - Aprimeeegr] Accumulated non-pareto optimal stage objective vector at stage eegr for the remainder of the stagesNeegr - B] Number of initial decision alternatives for production stage 2 - C] Number of initial decision alternatives for production stageN - COG k,eegr] Cutoff grade for decision,k, at production stage, eegr - D] Number of initial pareto solutions for production stage 1 - D eegr] Decision at stage eegr - E] Number of initial pareto solutions for production stage 2 - F] Number of initial pareto solutions for production stageN - j] A random objective function - J] Number of objective functions - LIFE k,eegr] Minelife for decision,k, at production stage, eegr - eegr] An arbitrary production stage - N] Final production stage - NPV] Expected net present value - NPV k,eegr] Project net present value for decision,k, at production stage eegr - OPR k,eegr] Ore production rate for decision,k, at production stage, eegr - S eegr] State of the system in stage eegr - thetav n] Immediate state objective vector at stage eegr
Keywords:Mine planning  mathematical optimization  decision making  dynamic programming
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号