| 水利科技期刊在不同评价系统收录中的统计分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 程琳,龚婷,季山.水利科技期刊在不同评价系统收录中的统计分析[J].水文,2015,35(4):77-84. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 程琳 龚婷 季山 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.《水文》编辑部2.《太平洋学报》编辑部3.黑龙江大学 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 梳理科技期刊在评价体系中的位置,可以更好地为广大作者提供帮助和服务。国内外期刊评价系统《中文核心期刊要目总览》、CSTPCD、CSCD以及SCI、EI、CA、SA、SC、JI、AJ分别收录中国水利科技期刊38种和27种(两者有24种重叠)。通过对收录及与现有(包括未收录)期刊主办单位类型、阅读量和引用量指标、国际化和网络化、属性分类、涵盖学科等进行比较,发现被收录期刊多属全国性学会及学术组织、部属科研院所、全国重点院校等主办,具有学科和人才优势,办刊条件好,编辑力量强,部分期刊有国际编委,网络化程度较高,学术水平较高,影响力较大,大多是中国水利科技期刊中的佼佼者。国内评价系统收录结果殊途同归,相对稳定,相对合理,证明国内评价系统基本科学、合理、可信。但存在收录期刊属性分类和涵盖学科失衡等问题,有待改进。
|
| 关 键 词： | 水利科技期刊 评价系统 评价指标 比较 |
| 收稿时间： | 2014/11/22 0:00:00 |
Statistical Analysis of Water Conservancy Scientific and Technical Journals in Different Evaluation Systems |
| |
| CHENG Lin,GONG Ting,JI Shan.Statistical Analysis of Water Conservancy Scientific and Technical Journals in Different Evaluation Systems[J].Hydrology,2015,35(4):77-84. |
| |
| Authors: | CHENG Lin GONG Ting JI Shan |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Editorial Board of Journal of China Hydrology, Beijing 100053, China; 2. Editorial Board of Pacific Journal, Beijing 100037, China; 3. Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China |
| |
| Abstract: | It is more help for the majority authors to analysis the position of sci-tech periodicals in the appraisal system. The periodical evaluation systems both at home and abroad like guide to Chinese core journals, CSTPCD, CSCD, SCI, EI, CA, SA, SC, JI, AJ, including 38 kinds and 27 kinds (There are 24 overlaps between them). Through comparing the type of host units, the reading and reference indexes, internationalization and networking,attribute classification, covering subjects of included and not included journals, found that most host units of included journals belong to academic organization, affiliated research institutes, national key universities and colleges. The hosts have advantage of subject and talent, good journal making conditions, high ability editors, higher network degree and academic level, influence widely, some of them have international member of the journal editorial board, most of them are outstanding in China water conservancy science and technology journals. The results of domestic evaluation system include all roads lead to Rome, have relatively stable and reasonable, prove that the evaluation systems in China are scientific, reasonable and credible. But need to be improved is that it has imbalance problems of collected periodicals attribute classification and cover subjects. |
| |
| Keywords: | water conservancy science and technology journal evaluation system evaluation index comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《水文》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《水文》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
