| “四川运动”之否定 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李玉文.“四川运动”之否定[J].地质科学,1979,14(4):374-377. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李玉文 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 成都地质矿产研究所 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “四川运动"的由来“四川运动”一名,为谭锡畴、李春昱1929-1931年在四川及原西康进行地质调查时所拟,其调查报告《四川西康地质志》文字部分于1959年出版,在这之前,李春昱等(1943,1948)”、侯德封等(1945)已引用了这一名称,但正式命名和论述是在1950年。
|
| 关 键 词： | , |
ON THE NEGATION OF SICHUANIAN MOVEMENT |
| |
| Li Yuwen.ON THE NEGATION OF SICHUANIAN MOVEMENT[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,1979,14(4):374-377. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Yuwen |
| |
| Institution: | Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources |
| |
| Abstract: | Studies, made during the last few years have thrown doubts on the validity of Sichuanian movement proposed by C. Y. Li. First in many areas the Cretaceous and Paleogene are conformable with each other, thus denying any movement at the end of Cretaceous or between Cretaceous and Tertiary.Second, the "Tunghu Conglomerate" in eastern Sichuan and western Hubei now known to contain Cretaceous reptiles, namely Meglosauridai, Hadrosauridai, Titano-sauridae and Carnosauria is no more belonging to Late Eocene in age as reported by C. Y. Li. It overlies unconformably the "Kueichow Series" of Jurassic, hence this unconformity indicates one phase of Yanshanian cycle, leaving no room for Sichuanian movement.On the whole, the Sichuanian movement is but a tautonym of the Himalayan cycle, Yanshanian cycle and Indosinian cycle already known in different parts of China. Consequently the name "Sichuanian movement" should be abandoned. |
| |
| Keywords: | , |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《地质科学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《地质科学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
