| Abstract: | Prospecting for kimberlites and related rocks in till-covered terrains requires a methodology for recovering a few small grains within tens of kilograms samples, necessitating 1 ppb sensitivity or better. As part of reconnaissance survey for the kimberlite indicator minerals, i.e. pyrope garnet, picroilmenite, chromite and chromian diopside, the Geological Survey of Finland (GTK) developed such a system by significantly modifying and augmenting a 3″ Knelson Concentrator that accomplishes nearly complete recovery of moderately heavy minerals (>0.25 mm) from till samples.Diamondiferous kimberlites occur in the eastern Finland around the Kaavi–Kuopio and Kuhmo areas and much of the rest of the Karelian craton remains prospective based on the empirical evidence necessary for diamond preservation: thick (>200 km) lithospheric mantle, low heat flow and Archaean age rocks. A target area in Lapland, 20×50 km in size, was selected for a pilot study to test extraction of chromite for the (1) discrimination of regionally and locally derived populations, and (2) recognition of possible kimberlitic/lamproitic chromites. Area selection was based on the regional occurrence of a variety of mantle-derived rocks, the recovery of a chromian pyrope grain from till in 1996 and most importantly, the well-established Quaternary stratigraphy in the region. The sample material consisted of sixty-two 80-kg excavator and 40-kg shovel samples. Approximately 1000 chromite grains, almost exclusively 0.25–0.5 mm in diameter, were recovered and analysed by electron microprobe.Tills in the sampling area proved to contain at least two compositional populations of chromite. The first is present in almost every sample and is apparently derived from layered mafic intrusions distal to and up-ice from the study area. The second population consists of chromites with low Ti, high Cr and Mg similar to inclusions in diamond. It is present in approximately one third of the samples, concentrated in a couple of clusters within the target area and is therefore considered to be of more local derivation. Since no high-Ti, high-Cr chromites diagnostic for kimberlites and lamproites were present in the samples, the source for the low-Ti, high-Cr, high-Mg chromite grains remains uncertain, but is probably not kimberlitic. Although this apparently is a negative outcome for diamond exploration in the target area, the main goal of the study was realised by showing the applicability of the system to heavy mineral separation from Quaternary glacial deposits. |
