Probing the (in)compatibilities of social theory and policy relevance in Piers Blaikie’s political ecology |
| |
| Authors: | Roderick P Neumann |
| |
| Institution: | Department of International Relations, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, United States |
| |
| Abstract: | One of Piers Blaikie’s most important contributions to the development of political ecology is his critique of land and resource conservation policy in the global South. In this paper I trace the development of Blaikie’s ideas about the policy relevance of political ecology, focusing particularly on the challenges posed by the introduction of poststructural social theory into the field. I begin by revisiting Blaikie’s earlier critiques of environment and development policy. This will provide the departure point to explore how his thinking on the relationship of theory and policy and of academic and development practices has evolved in subsequent writings. I have invented two personas, “early Blaikie” and “late Blaikie”, to facilitate this task. Second, I want to probe some of the challenges that late Blaikie presents for doing political ecology research, to some extent by pitting early Blaikie against late Blaikie and letting them hash it out. Third, I turn to my own and others’ research and consultation experiences as a way to examine the possibilities for reconciling theoretically driven critiques with policy relevant research. |
| |
| Keywords: | Political ecology Environmental policy Social construction of nature Environmental narratives Conservation |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
