| 安徽庐枞盆地龙桥铁矿床赋矿层位碎屑锆石年代学及其对赋矿地层时代的制约研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 洪浩澜,周涛发,欧邦国,范裕,Noel C White.安徽庐枞盆地龙桥铁矿床赋矿层位碎屑锆石年代学及其对赋矿地层时代的制约研究[J].地质学报,2015,89(7):1258-1272. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 洪浩澜 周涛发 欧邦国 范裕 Noel C White |
| |
| 作者单位： | 合肥工业大学,合肥工业大学,安徽省庐江龙桥矿业有限公司,合肥工业大学,合肥工业大学 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文得到国家自然科学基金项目（批准号：41320104003，41172084，41172086）及“中国区域成矿规律研究与总结”（编号：12120114039701）项目资助。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 龙桥铁矿床是庐枞盆地一个大型层控矽卡岩型铁矿床,顺层产于沉积岩地层中,受地层控制特征明显,具有显著的成矿特色。龙桥铁矿床赋矿层位时代确定对于该类矿床的成因研究和找矿勘探有着重要的意义。龙桥铁矿床赋矿地层为一套厚度20~150m的泥灰岩、角砾状灰岩、白云岩、泥质粉砂岩和石英杂砂岩,由于缺乏标志性化石和岩性标志层,赋矿地层的时代归属长期存在争议。本文在野外研究的基础上,对龙桥铁矿床主矿体顶底板不同位置的4组砂岩样品(ZK109,ZK309,ZK007和ZK1603)和矿区外围侏罗系罗岭组砂岩(LQWW)开展了系统碎屑锆石年代学研究,定年结果表明,ZK109,ZK309,ZK007和ZK1603样品碎屑锆石的最小年龄和最大年龄分别为262.1±3.2 Ma,2589.8±15.0 Ma;261.8±1.9 Ma,2520.1±11.1 Ma;264.6±2.0 Ma,2947.2±51.4Ma和257.1±1.9Ma,2717.0±21.0。LQWW样品的碎屑锆石最小年龄为166.0±1.4Ma,最大年龄为3842.6±6.5 Ma。结合区域地质特征分析,上述碎屑锆石年龄特征表明,龙桥铁矿床赋矿围岩形成时代应为中三叠世。结合近期庐枞地区的勘查成果,本文认为庐枞北部是寻找龙桥式铁矿床的有利地区。
|
| 关 键 词： | 庐枞盆地，龙桥铁矿床，赋矿层位，碎屑锆石，中三叠统，东马鞍山组 |
| 收稿时间： | 2014/11/28 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2015/2/12 0:00:00 |
Detrital zircon U-Pb chronology analysis of the ore-bearing strata at Longqiao deposit in the Lujiang-Zongyang basin, Anhui Province, China. |
| |
| Hong Haolan,Zhou Taof,Ou Bangguo,Fan Yu and Noel C White.Detrital zircon U-Pb chronology analysis of the ore-bearing strata at Longqiao deposit in the Lujiang-Zongyang basin, Anhui Province, China.[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2015,89(7):1258-1272. |
| |
| Authors: | Hong Haolan Zhou Taof Ou Bangguo Fan Yu and Noel C White |
| |
| Institution: | Hefei University of Technology,Hefei University of Technology,Lujiang Longqiao Mining Co. Ltd. of Anhui Province,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei University of Technology |
| |
| Abstract: | The Longqiao iron deposit is a large stratabound skarn type iron ore deposit in the Luzong ore district. Identification of the ore formation is important for the research and exploration, but distinguishing between two possible host units (Luoling and Dongmaanshan Formations) is controversial. The host formation at Longqiao is marl, brecciated limestone, dolomite, argillaceous siltstone and quartz sandstone, with a thickness of 20-150 m. We collected sandstones from the Luoling Formation outside the deposit and a unit of uncertain stratigraphic affinities about 5 m above the orebody. Using detrital zircon U-Pb chronology we found that there were significant differences in zircon concordant ages of the sandstones from the two locations. Zircon concordant ages of sample LQWW from the Luoling Formation outside the deposit are in the range 166.0 ± 1.4Ma to 3842.6 ± 6.5Ma; zircon concordant ages of samples from the unit hosting the orebody are in the range 262.1 ± 3.2Ma to 2589.8 ± 15.0Ma (ZK109), 261.8±1.9Ma to 2520.1±11.1Ma (ZK309), 264.6 ± 2.0Ma to 2947.2 ± 51.4Ma (ZK007) and 257.1±1.9Ma to 2717.0±21.0 Ma (ZK1603). These data and their age distributions indicate that the unit hosting ore at the Longqiao deposit differs from the Luoling Formation outside the deposit, and we infer that the host unit is not part of the Luoling Formation and probably belongs to the Dongmaanshan Formation. Combining with the recent exploration achievement, it is proposed that the north part of Luzong basin is a good district for looking for Longqiao type deposit. |
| |
| Keywords: | Luzong Basin Longqiao iron deposit ore formation detrital zircon Middle Triassic Dongmaanshan Formation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《地质学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《地质学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
