首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

考虑土体应力历史影响的沉降修正初探
引用本文:王志亮,孙锡杰.考虑土体应力历史影响的沉降修正初探[J].岩土力学,2006,27(10):1723-1726.
作者姓名:王志亮  孙锡杰
作者单位:1. 中国科技大学 工程学院,合肥 230027;2. 青岛海防工程局,青岛 266031
摘    要:在分层总和法中,e-lgp法比av 法、e-p法优越之处在于其考虑了土体应力历史的影响,但由于参数的难以确定,导致e-lgp法在实际工程中很少应用。介绍了一种在无高压固结试验时可使av法、e-p法中计入土体应力历史影响的思路,提出了相应的修正系数概念,分析了该修正系数对于不同状态土体的大致取值范围,并给出了其近似计算式。实例验证表明,av法、e-p法经修正后结果更趋于合理,且与e-lgp法很接近,故在工程实践中具有一定的参考价值。

关 键 词:土体  分层总和法  应力历史  修正系数  沉降  
文章编号:1000-7598-(2006)10-1723-04
收稿时间:2004-03-26
修稿时间:2004-04-02

Discussion of settlement modification considering stress history of soil mass
WANG Zhi-liang,SUN Xi-jie.Discussion of settlement modification considering stress history of soil mass[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2006,27(10):1723-1726.
Authors:WANG Zhi-liang  SUN Xi-jie
Institution:1. College of Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China; 2. Qingdao Coast-defense Engineering Department, Qingdao 266031, China
Abstract:In layerwise summation method, e-lgp is superior to av and e-p method; the reason is that it can be in consideration of the influence of soil stress history. But it is a pity that e-lgp method is rarely used in practical engineering because the related parameters are difficult to be determined. One thought to consider the influences of soil stress history in av and e-p method is given when lack of high pressure consolidation test data; and the corresponding concept of correction coefficient Ms is put forward. Besides, the approximate spans of Ms for different status soils are analyzed. Then, the calculated formula is developed. It is found that the results of av and e-p methods which are rectified with the correction coefficient are more accuracy and more closed to the e-lgp method. This method can be reference for engineers.
Keywords:soil mass  layerwise summation method (LST)  stress history  correction coefficient  settlement
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《岩土力学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《岩土力学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号