|
|||||
|
|
| 中国城市技术转移网络空间格局分析——基于企业控股与专利转移的视角 | |
| 引用本文： | 刘耀彬,孙敏.中国城市技术转移网络空间格局分析——基于企业控股与专利转移的视角[J].地理科学,2022,42(10):1695-1705. |
| 作者姓名： | 刘耀彬 孙敏 |
| 作者单位： | 1.南昌大学经济管理学院，江西 南昌 330031 2.南昌大学中国中部经济社会发展研究中心，江西 南昌 330031 |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目(41871155) |
| 摘 要： | 基于大数据挖掘获取的2018年中国城市间战略性新兴产业企业控股数据与发明专利权转移数据，模拟企业控股与专利转移2种路径下的城市技术转移网络。结合地理空间及复杂网络分析方法，从城市中心性、多尺度网络关联强度、社区结构及距离衰减特征等方面进行了分析。结果表明：① 企业控股与专利转移的城市强度中心性分别呈“核心?边缘”与带状集群分布，区域中心城市与东部沿海发达城市分别在企业与专利联系网络中发挥了主要的中介作用，专利转移相比企业控股更有利于不同专业类别的技术转移；② 企业联系网络具有等级层次性，专利联系网络则更具开放性与流动性。其中企业控股为具有协调性的单向主导型转移路径，而专利转移为追求效益性的双向交互型转移路径；③ 企业联系网络中主要为“连片集聚，逐步扩散”的地理邻近式社区结构，而专利联系网络呈“局部合伙，广泛协作”的跨区域组团模式。④ 企业控股与专利转移均具有显著的距离衰减特征，但二者在不同阶段的距离衰减模式存在差异。 |
| 关 键 词： | 技术转移 企业控股 社区结构 距离衰减 城市网络 |
| 收稿时间： | 2021-05-14 |
| 修稿时间： | 2021-12-23 |
Spatial Pattern of Interurban Technology Transfer Network in China: A Case Study from the Corporate Holding and Patent Transfer |
|
| Liu Yaobin,Sun Min.Spatial Pattern of Interurban Technology Transfer Network in China: A Case Study from the Corporate Holding and Patent Transfer[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2022,42(10):1695-1705. | |
| Authors: | Liu Yaobin Sun Min |
| Institution: | 1. School of Economics&Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, China 2. Research Center of Central China Economic and Social Development, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, China |
| Abstract: | Based on the data of corporate holding in strategic emerging industries and the data of invention patents transfer among Chinese cities in 2018, the interurban technology transfer network based on corporate holding and patent transfer is constructed respectively. Combined with geospatial and complex network analysis methods, this paper analyzes the characteristics of urban centrality, multi-scale network correlation strength, community structure and distance attenuation. The results show that: 1) The urban intensity centrality of corporate holdings and patent transfers are distributed in “core-periphery” and banded clusters respectively. Regional central cities and developed eastern coastal cities have played a major intermediary role in the corporate and patent network. Patent transfer is more conducive to technology transfer in different professional categories than corporate holding; 2) The corporate network is hierarchical, and the patent network is more open and liquid. Among them, corporate holding is a coordinated unilateral leading transfer path, while patent transfer is a bilateral interactive transfer path pursuing efficiency; 3) The corporate network is mainly a geographically adjacent community structure of “contiguous gathering and gradually spreading”, while the patent network is a cross-regional group model of “partial partnership and extensive collaboration”; 4) Both corporate holding and patent transfer have obvious distance attenuation characteristics, but their distance attenuation patterns are different at different stages. |
| Keywords: | technology transfer corporate holding community structure distance attenuation city network |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学》下载免费的PDF全文 | |