| 中国文化地理学的研究范式：争论、张力与延展 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郭文.中国文化地理学的研究范式：争论、张力与延展[J].地理科学,2023,43(1):50-60. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郭文 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京农业大学人文与社会发展学院，江苏 南京 210095 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目(41971186);国家自然科学基金项目(42171240);江苏省“青蓝工程”中青年学术带头人科研项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 文化地理学研究范式的探索程度，关涉文化地理学学科建设的深度，也是文化地理学科学研究是否成熟的标志。改革开放40多年来，中国文化地理学取得了前所未有的成绩。但时至今日，学科内外依然对文化地理学的研究范式存在争论和疑虑。以文化研究的“弱范式”和“强范式”为切入点，对弱、强范式内涵进行了梳理和界定，并对中国文化地理学研究范式进行解析，认为传统文化地理学和新文化地理学在本质上契合文化研究的“弱范式”和“强范式”，在实践中虽然每个范式都引发了争论，但也存在内部张力和延展可能，不应看作是范式的“断代”，将其理解为基于“范式选择”和“阐释效能”内涵更符合实际。在当前流动性和文化混杂性背景下，传统分割式单一范式思维不能较好地回应文化地理发展的新内涵，文化地理学范式探索应该是一个动态且需要不断确立学术话语权的过程，探索“时空综合视角”下的“混杂融合”范式更加符合新的时代诉求。未来中国文化地理学界需要超越“范式分割”和“阶段性求安式”的惯性思维，重新定位和精准把握文化地理学的时代使命和学术承诺，提升文化地理学范式解释能力，赋予文化地理学与时代匹配的范式内涵。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文化地理学 弱范式与强范式 争论与张力 范式延展 混杂融合范式 |
| 收稿时间： | 2022-04-08 |
| 修稿时间： | 2022-06-04 |
Research paradigm of Chinese Cultural Geography: Debate,tension and extension |
| |
| Guo Wen.Research paradigm of Chinese Cultural Geography: Debate,tension and extension[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2023,43(1):50-60. |
| |
| Authors: | Guo Wen |
| |
| Institution: | College of Humanities and Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The degree of exploration of the research paradigm of Cultural Geography is related to the depth of the discipline construction of Cultural Geography, and it is also a sign of the maturity of the scientific research of Cultural Geography. Over the past 40 years of reform and opening up, China's Cultural Geography has made unprecedented achievements. But up to now, there are still debates and doubts about the research paradigm of Cultural Geography inside and outside the discipline. Starting from the 'weak paradigm' and 'strong paradigm' of cultural research, this paper combs and defines its connotation, analyzes the research paradigm of Chinese Cultural Geography, and holds that traditional Cultural Geography and new Cultural Geography are essentially in line with the 'weak paradigm' and 'strong paradigm' of cultural research. In practice, although each paradigm has triggered controversy, there are also internal tensions and extension possibilities, which should not be regarded as the 'dating' of the paradigm. It is more practical to understand it based on 'paradigm selection' and 'interpretation efficiency'. In the context of today's mobility and cultural hybridity, the traditional split single paradigm thinking can not better respond to the new connotation of the development of Cultural Geography. The exploration of Cultural Geography paradigm should be a dynamic process that needs to continuously establish the academic discourse power. Exploring the 'hybrid and integrated' paradigm under the 'comprehensive perspective of time and space' is more in line with the demands of the new era. The study calls on the future Chinese Cultural Geography community to go beyond the inertial thinking of 'paradigm division' and 'phased peace seeking', reposition and accurately grasp the era mission and academic commitment of Cultural Geography, improve the interpretation ability of Cultural Geography paradigm, and endow cultural geography paradigm with new connotation. |
| |
| Keywords: | Cultural Geography weak paradigm and strong paradigm debate and tension paradigm extension hybrid and integrated paradigm |
|
| 点击此处可从《地理科学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《地理科学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
